Prop Firm Payout Analytics and Leaderboard

Prop firm payout analytics shows how much money a firm says it has paid funded traders and on what terms payouts are released. Totals are firm-reported: taken from official firm websites and checked weekly, not counted from blockchain transactions. That difference limits how far you can rely on any single number.

Reported totals versus on-chain verified payouts

A reported total is a cumulative figure a firm publishes about itself, using its own counting method. The leaderboard ranks these claims as a scale indicator. A large total reflects how long a firm has operated, how many funded accounts it runs and the account sizes it sells, not what share of traders ever got paid.

On-chain verification works from the other direction. When a firm pays through crypto rails, either direct stablecoin transfers or a payout platform that settles on a blockchain, each transfer to a trader’s wallet is publicly visible on a blockchain explorer. A tracker built this way reports, per firm, the verified total, the number of transactions, the largest single payout, the average and the time of the latest payout. The average is simply:

Average payout = verified total ÷ number of verified payouts

Hypothetical example: 200 verified transfers adding up to $300,000 give an average of $1,500. One $25,000 outlier among them would lift the average while barely moving the count.

On-chain figures can be confirmed, but they only capture payments on the tracked rails. Bank wires and other off-chain methods do not appear, so a verified total can sit far below a firm’s reported total without contradicting it.

How to read the firm table

• Reported total: the firm’s published lifetime payout claim. Identical totals appear on paired entries such as FundedNext and FundedNext Futures, E8 Markets and E8 Futures, and the two Blue Guardian listings. Count each pair once to avoid double-counting.
• Processing time: how long a payout takes once requested or approved. Labels mix units (“9 seconds”, “40 hours”, “same day upon approval”), and some describe only part of the flow, such as FundingPips’ “90% of rewards processed in seconds”.
• Frequency: when you are eligible to request a payout, separate from processing time and often conditional. Topstep lists payouts after every 5 winning days of $150+. Alpha Futures lists up to 4 times per month after 5 winning trading days of $200 or more. Tradeify’s 150K account lists a $250 minimum profit per day. Lucid Trading lists every 5 days with the daily loss limit off and on demand with it on.
• Split: your share of profits. For example, an 80% split on $5,000 of gross profit pays $4,000 before any fees or withdrawal minimums. “Up to” values depend on plan or add-ons. A listing such as WeMasterTrade’s “30% / 90%” has no configuration attached, so take it as listed.
• Score: a separate rating out of 10, not a ranking by payouts. Topstep has the largest reported total and a 6.4 score.

Reading the distribution charts

The profit split and frequency charts count labels exactly as firms write them. “Bi-Weekly”, “Bi-weekly”, “14 days” and “Every 14 days” appear as separate bars, as do “Up to 90%” and “up to 90%”, so merge equivalent labels before judging what is typical. The processing-time chart places each firm in one bucket (under 1 hour, 1 to 24 hours, 1 to 3 days, over 3 days). Firms quoting a range such as “24-48 hours” sit near a boundary.

Limits that change the conclusion

Coverage is partial. Of the 74 firms covered, 50 report a total, and a firm with no published figure is absent from the totals rather than ranked at zero. Payout speed and frequency are stated policies, not measured outcomes for individual requests.