What Is Venture Capital? What Venture Capitalists (VCs) Do

Search Fintrev

Search our guides, reviews and glossary.

Venture capital (VC) is private equity financing that investors provide to young, high-growth companies in exchange for an ownership stake. A venture capitalist is the investor, usually a professional working inside a venture capital firm, who chooses those companies, negotiates the terms, and helps steer the business toward a sale or public listing. The money is not a loan. VCs earn a return only if the shares they buy become worth more than they paid. Because most young companies fail, venture capital depends on a few very large wins making up for many losses.

What Is Venture Capital?

Venture capital is one branch of private equity: it buys ownership in companies that are not traded on a stock exchange. What sets it apart is the kind of company it funds: young businesses with unproven economics, often built around a new technology, that could grow very large but carry a high chance of failure. VC stands for venture capital, and “a VC” can mean either a venture capitalist or a venture capital firm.

Those companies usually cannot borrow much from a bank. They may have little revenue, no profits and few assets to pledge as collateral. A lender would earn only its interest if things go well and lose principal if they go badly. An equity investor faces the same downside but owns a share of the upside, so it can accept the risk in return for the chance that the company becomes worth many times what it was when the investor bought in.

Venture capital also comes with more than money: strategic advice, introductions to customers and partners, help with hiring, and the credibility of backing by a known firm. A company described as VC-backed has taken money from one or more venture capital investors, which normally means it has sold preferred shares to them and accepted some investor rights over major decisions.

How Venture Capital Works

The fund structure: general partners and limited partners

A venture capital firm raises a fund by collecting commitments from limited partners (LPs) such as pension funds, endowments, foundations, insurers, family offices and wealthy individuals. They agree to provide a set amount of capital over the life of the fund, commonly 10 to 12 years. The money is not all handed over on day one: the firm “calls” capital as it finds companies to invest in and as existing portfolio companies need follow-on funding.

Most VC firms are organized as limited partnerships, with the firm serving as the general partner (GP). It makes the investment decisions, manages the portfolio, and has the legal duty to run the fund. Limited partners are passive: they share in the fund’s results but do not choose investments. A single firm often manages several funds raised in different years, each with its own pool of LPs and its own investment period.

In the United States, venture capital funds and their advisers fall under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversight as private funds, although advisers that manage only qualifying venture funds face lighter registration requirements than many other investment managers.

How venture capitalists are paid

VC managers are typically paid in two ways:

• Management fee: an annual fee, often around 2% of committed capital during the investment period, that pays salaries, office costs and due diligence.
• Carried interest (“carry”): a share of the fund’s profits, often around 20%, paid to the general partner. The remaining profits go to the limited partners.

The exact terms depend on the fund agreement. Fee rates may step down after the investment period, and agreements differ on whether LPs must get their contributed capital back before any carry is paid.

Hypothetical example. A firm raises a $100 million fund with a 2% annual management fee on commitments for 10 years and 20% carry, paid only after LPs recover their full $100 million. Fees total $20 million over the fund’s life. If the fund eventually returns $300 million in sale proceeds, the profit over committed capital is $200 million. The GP’s carry is 20% of that, or $40 million, and LPs receive $260 million. If the fund returns only $100 million, there is no profit, so no carry is paid, but the GP has still collected its fees. That asymmetry is one reason LPs scrutinize a firm’s track record before committing.

Roles inside a venture capital firm

Titles vary from firm to firm, but most venture capital firms have three broad tiers:

• Associates usually come from consulting, banking or equity research. They analyze business models and markets, support portfolio companies, and may bring promising startups to senior partners’ attention, though they rarely make final decisions.
• Principals are mid-level investors. They source deals, negotiate terms for investments and exits, and often sit on portfolio company boards. Promotion to partner usually depends on the returns their deals generate.
• Partners set the firm’s investment focus, approve investments and exits, sit on the boards of key companies, and represent the firm to founders and LPs.

What venture capitalists look for

VCs evaluate a startup mainly on a few points:

• The team: founders and managers who can execute, recruit and adapt.
• Market size: a market large enough that a successful company could be worth many times the investment.
• Product and advantage: a distinctive product or service with something competitors cannot easily copy, such as technology, network effects or cost structure.
• Ownership and influence: a stake large enough that a win matters to the fund, and usually enough rights to influence major decisions.

VCs tend to favor industries they know. Historically, most venture dollars have gone to technology: software and the internet, computer hardware, telecommunications and mobile, and healthcare and biotech.

A common misconception is that VCs fund ideas on a napkin. Some seed-stage funds do, but much venture capital goes to companies that already have a product and early revenue and need capital to scale.

Stages of venture funding

Companies typically raise money in rounds. Each round sells new shares at a negotiated price, and the investors who participate change as the company matures.

Within a round, money may be released in tranches tied to milestones such as a revenue target or product launch. Even when the full amount arrives at once, the next round depends on the company showing progress, so staged funding works as a check on whether to keep investing.

Securing VC funding

For a founder, the process generally runs as follows:

1. Pitch and business plan. The company presents its plan, market, product, team and financials.
2. Due diligence. The firm investigates the business model, technology, customers, management, legal structure and operating history.
3. Term sheet and negotiation. The parties agree on valuation, the amount raised, the type of shares, board seats and investor protections.
4. Closing and involvement. The firm funds the round, usually takes a board seat, and monitors and advises the company.
5. Exit. The investor sells its stake through an acquisition, merger or IPO, commonly four to six years or more after the initial investment.

Interpreting Venture Capital Returns

Target multiples and the power law

Because each investment is risky, venture capitalists aim for very high returns on individual deals. A Series A investor, for example, may look for a potential return of 10 to 15 times its money on a successful exit, so a $5 million investment would need to be worth at least $50 million at the exit.

Those targets exist because venture returns follow a power-law distribution. Outcomes are not spread evenly around an average. A handful of companies return many times the fund, and the rest return little or nothing. A portfolio of 10 to 20 companies is often planned around a pattern like this:

• One or two “home runs” returning more than 10 times their cost
• Two or three moderate successes returning roughly 2.5 to 5 times
• Four or five that return about their cost or a small profit
• Four or five or more that fail, losing part or all of the investment

Hypothetical portfolio. A fund invests $1 million in each of 20 companies, $20 million in total. Eight fail and return nothing. Six return their cost, $6 million. Four return 3 times, $12 million. Two return 15 times, $30 million. Total proceeds are $48 million, a gross multiple of 2.4 times. Remove the two winners and proceeds fall to $18 million, a loss. The entire result depends on two companies out of 20.

The multiple also needs to be read against time. Measured as compound annual growth rate, 2.4 times over 10 years is roughly 9% a year before fees and carry. The same 2.4 times over five years would be about 19% a year. A multiple says how much money came back; an annualized figure says how fast.

What fund-level evidence shows

Top-performing venture funds have produced annual returns of 30% or more, and some fund managers target 20% to 35% a year. Industry-wide results are more modest. A 2023 Cambridge Associates benchmark put the 20-year annualized return of U.S. venture capital funds at 12.33%, against 12.40% for the MSCI All Country World Index of global stocks over the same period. Venture investors also give up liquidity for a decade or more, so a return similar to public equities is a weaker result than the numbers alone suggest.

At the company level, research from Harvard Business School has suggested that as many as 75% of venture-backed companies never return cash to investors. Results are concentrated among a minority of firms, which is why access to the best-performing managers is a central concern for limited partners.

Example of a VC Deal

The round (hypothetical). ABC Inc., a software startup, wants to raise $5 million in a Series A to hire engineers, build new features and expand sales. VC firm XYZ leads the round with $3 million, and two other investors put in the remaining $2 million.

Valuation. The parties agree on a pre-money valuation of $20 million, the company’s value before the new cash arrives. Adding the $5 million gives a post-money valuation of $25 million.

Ownership. Each investor’s stake equals its investment divided by the post-money valuation:

• XYZ: $3 million ÷ $25 million = 12%
• Other Series A investors: $2 million ÷ $25 million = 8%
• Founders and employees: the remaining 80%

Investor rights. XYZ receives Series A preferred stock and one seat on the board. The preferred shares carry a 1x non-participating liquidation preference: in a sale or wind-down, Series A holders receive their original $5 million before common shareholders get anything, or they can convert to common and take their pro rata share, whichever is larger.

If the company sells for $15 million. As common shareholders, Series A investors would get 20% of $15 million, or $3 million. The preference entitles them to $5 million, so they take the preference, and common holders split the remaining $10 million. The founders’ 80% of the shares translates into 66.7% of the proceeds. If the company instead sells for $100 million, Series A investors convert and take 20%, or $20 million, because that beats the $5 million preference. The preference only matters in weaker outcomes.

The next round. Suppose ABC later raises a $10 million Series B at a $40 million pre-money valuation, for a $50 million post-money valuation. New investors own $10 million ÷ $50 million = 20%. Everyone else is diluted by the same proportion, keeping 80% of their prior stake: XYZ falls from 12% to 9.6% and the founders from 80% to 64%. Their percentages shrink, but at a $50 million value XYZ’s 9.6% is worth $4.8 million on paper, up from $3 million. XYZ might buy part of the new round to keep its stake from shrinking. These calculations ignore option pool changes, which in real rounds often dilute existing holders further.

Why Is Venture Capital Important?

Many new businesses, such as a company developing a chip, a drug or a software platform, need years of salaries, equipment and testing before their first sale, with no profits to reinvest. Venture capital fills that gap by spreading the risk of failure across investors who expect to lose on many bets, funneling capital into ideas that would otherwise go unfunded. Some of the largest companies in the world started with venture money:

• Apple received $150,000 from Sequoia Capital and $250,000 from former Intel manager Mike Markkula in its early years, helping it bring the Apple II to market.
• Google took $100,000 from angel investor Andy Bechtolsheim in 1998, followed by a combined $25 million from Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins.
• Facebook received $12.7 million from Accel Partners in 2005 for roughly 11% of the company.
• Uber raised an $11 million Series A led by Benchmark in 2011.

History of Venture Capital

Financing risky ventures for a share of the profits is centuries old; long-distance shipping and whaling voyages were often funded this way. The modern industry began in 1946, when Harvard Business School professor Georges Doriot, often called the “father of venture capital,” became president of the American Research and Development Corporation (ARDC). ARDC raised a $3.58 million fund from institutions such as universities and insurers to invest in companies commercializing technology developed during World War II. One early $200,000 investment was worth $1.8 million when that company went public in 1955.

The Small Business Investment Act of 1958 gave small business investment companies licensed by the Small Business Administration government-backed financing and tax advantages. Fairchild Semiconductor, founded in 1957, became one of the earliest venture-backed startups, and San Francisco Bay Area firms standardized the limited partnership structure still used today. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, capital gains tax cuts and a 1979 clarification of ERISA’s “prudent man” rule, which let pension funds invest part of their assets in venture funds, accelerated the industry. Venture funding grew to $4.9 billion by 1987 and is now measured in hundreds of billions of dollars.

Venture Capital vs. Related Forms of Funding

Venture capital vs. private equity

Venture capital is a subset of private equity. In practice, though, private equity usually refers to buyout firms that purchase established, profitable companies, often taking majority control and using borrowed money to finance the deal. Venture capitalists typically buy minority stakes in young companies, use little or no debt, and rely on growth rather than operational restructuring or leverage to create returns.

Venture capitalists vs. angel investors

Angel investors are individuals, often successful entrepreneurs or retired executives, who invest their own money. Venture capitalists invest money pooled from limited partners and owe those LPs a fiduciary duty. Angels usually come in earlier, at the pre-seed or seed stage, and write smaller checks, commonly in the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars, while VC rounds typically run into the millions. Angels often co-invest with other angels and frequently precede venture funding rather than compete with it.

Venture capital vs. loans

Venture capital firms buy equity; they do not lend. There is no interest, no repayment schedule and no personal liability for founders if the company fails. The cost is ownership and control: the founder gives up a share of future value and accepts investor rights over major decisions. A separate product called venture debt does exist, in which lenders provide loans to companies that have already raised venture equity, but it is a loan with repayment obligations, not venture capital itself.

Limitations of Venture Capital

Venture capital offers large amounts of capital without collateral or cash flow, plus guidance, networks and credibility for later fundraising. It also has costs for both founders and investors.

For founders:

• Dilution and loss of control. Each round reduces founders’ ownership, and investors gain board seats and veto rights over major decisions.
• Pressure for rapid growth. A fund that needs a few companies to return 10 times or more pushes for aggressive targets. A business that could be solidly profitable at a modest size may not fit what the fund needs.
• Exit pressure. Fund life is finite, so investors may push for a sale or IPO on the fund’s timeline rather than the company’s.
• Preference stacks. In modest sales, investors can be paid first and founders and employees can receive little even after years of work.

For investors:

• Illiquidity. Capital is locked up for a decade or more, with no market on which to sell a fund stake easily.
• Concentrated results. Many portfolio companies fail, returns are concentrated in a minority of funds, and average returns may not beat public stocks by enough to justify the lack of liquidity.
• Valuation uncertainty. Interim fund values are estimates based on private round prices, not market prices, so reported performance before exits can change sharply. Comparisons with public benchmarks such as the S&P 500 need to account for that.

Alternatives to VC Funding

Venture capital suits only companies aiming for very large outcomes. Besides angel investment, options include:

• Bootstrapping: funding growth from founders’ savings and company revenue, keeping full control but limiting speed.
• Crowdfunding: raising small amounts from many people, either as pre-orders or, in equity crowdfunding, for shares.
• Bank and SBA loans: borrowing without giving up equity, usually requiring collateral and an operating track record.
• Revenue-based financing: capital repaid as a percentage of ongoing revenue, for companies that already have sales.
• Grants: funding from government agencies, foundations or universities, often for science and technology research.
• Peer-to-peer lending: loans arranged through online platforms that connect borrowers with lenders.
• Token sales (ICOs): sales of crypto tokens, used mainly by blockchain projects, with significant regulatory risk.

FAQs

The Bottom Line

Venture capital fits founders building companies that could become very large and investors who can lock up money for a decade. Founders trade ownership, board control and exit timing for capital they could not borrow. Investors accept frequent failures and concentrated results, and industry-wide returns have roughly matched global stocks. Founders with modest growth plans may do better with bootstrapping, loans, grants or revenue-based financing.