What Is Hawala? How the Hawala Money Transfer System Works

Search Fintrev

Search our guides, reviews and glossary.

Hawala is an informal system for transferring money in which value moves between two places through a network of brokers, called hawaladars, without the money physically crossing a border or passing through a bank. A broker in the sender’s location takes the funds, a partner broker in the recipient’s location pays out an equivalent amount from his own cash, and the two brokers settle the debt between themselves later. The system rests on trust and personal relationships rather than contracts, bank accounts or official promissory notes.

What Is Hawala?

The word is usually traced to the Arabic ḥawāla (حوالة), meaning “transfer,” “assignment” or “bill of exchange.” It is also linked to a Hindi word meaning “reference.” In Islamic commercial law, hawala refers to the assignment of a debt from one party to another, which describes the mechanism well: the obligation to pay the recipient is assigned to a broker at the other end. The system developed in South Asia around the 8th century and is used worldwide today, particularly by migrant workers sending remittances home.

Hawala is often called underground banking or an alternative remittance system. Neither label means every transfer is criminal; both describe a channel outside the regulated banking system. Hawala money is simply the funds moved this way. With no account-to-account transfer, no wire-style paper trail and no signed promissory note, the money never shows up in the formal financial system as a cross-border payment.

The brokers are known as hawaladars, hawala dealers or hawala operators. Many run the service alongside another business, such as a currency exchange, travel agency or trading company, though that arrangement is not required.

How Hawala Works

A hawala transfer has two separate legs: the customer transaction and the settlement between brokers.

The customer transaction:

1. The sender gives cash to a hawaladar in their city, along with the recipient’s name, the destination city and an agreed password or code.
2. The hawaladar contacts a partner broker in the recipient’s city by phone, message or other channel and passes on the amount and the code.
3. The recipient visits the partner broker, gives the correct code, and receives the money in local currency, less any commission.

The settlement: at this point the first broker owes the second broker the amount paid out. That debt can be cleared in several ways: cash, property, services, goods, or transfers flowing in the opposite direction. Hawaladars keep informal journals of credits and debits with each partner, and balances may be left open and netted over time rather than settled transfer by transfer.

Interpreting hawala

The key idea is that hawala moves value, not currency. The sender’s cash stays in the sender’s country, and the recipient’s cash already sat in the recipient’s country. What crosses the border is information, plus a running balance between two brokers.

Enforcement comes from reputation. A hawaladar who fails to honor a payment loses standing and can be cut off from the network or the community it serves. That social penalty replaces the contracts, courts and deposit protections that back a bank transfer. It works only as long as each participant values continued access to the network more than the money a single default would bring.

Example of a Hawala Transfer

Hypothetical example; the names, amounts and commission are illustrative, not actual market terms.

Maryam lives in one country and wants her brother Amir, who lives in another, to receive $200.

• Maryam goes to Nasir, a local hawaladar, and hands him $200 plus his commission. She gives him Amir’s name, city and the password “blue river.”
• Nasir contacts Muhammad, a hawaladar in Amir’s city, and asks him to pay $200 to whoever presents that password under Amir’s name.
• Amir visits Muhammad, gives the password, and is paid the equivalent of $200 in local currency from Muhammad’s own cash.
• Nasir now owes Muhammad $200. Nothing has been wired, and no IOU has been signed.

Delivery in a transfer like this can take one to two days, and sometimes only a few hours.

Now suppose that the following week a trader in Amir’s city asks Muhammad to send $200 to a supplier in Maryam’s city. Nasir pays the supplier, and Muhammad’s debt to Nasir cancels the earlier balance. Two transfers have been completed, money has been delivered in both countries, and no money has crossed the border at all. When flows between two locations don’t balance, the brokers have to settle the difference another way, such as through a cash payment, a trade shipment or a third broker.

The cost to the user may exceed the stated commission. If the payout is in a different currency, the broker’s exchange rate is part of the price. Comparing what the recipient actually receives with what was paid shows the full cost.

Why People Use Hawala

Access. A hawala customer needs no bank account and, in many informal settings, no government-issued ID. For people without either, hawala may be the only practical way to send money abroad.

Cost and speed. Hawala is generally described as faster and cheaper than bank transfers on the corridors it serves, with less paperwork. To attract foreign exchange flows, some dealers waive fees for expatriate customers.

Reach. A hawala network can pay out in towns and regions with little or no banking infrastructure, as long as a broker is present.

Familiarity. The system often runs through family, ethnic or regional ties, so users may trust a known local broker more than an unfamiliar institution.

Restricted environments. Hawala networks are also used where capital controls or sanctions limit official money flows. Traders and expatriates from sanctioned countries such as Iran may use them to pay counterparties in neighboring states. Whether that use is lawful depends on the sanctions and money transfer laws that apply to everyone involved.

Limitations and Risks of Hawala

Use in illicit finance. Limited records and no audit trail make it hard to trace where money came from or where it went. That makes hawala useful for laundering proceeds of crime, evading tax on unrecorded business, and helping corrupt officials or wealthy individuals move and conceal assets. Investigators tracking terrorist financing depend on following the money, and a hawala chain gives them little to follow from the source of funds to the end user.

No formal recourse for customers. If a broker disappears, refuses to pay or is shut down by authorities, an informal hawala customer has no deposit insurance, no regulator complaint process and often no written receipt to rely on.

Legal exposure for users. In countries that prohibit informal hawala, the sender or recipient can face penalties as well as the broker, and funds can be confiscated.

Settlement risk inside the network. Brokers carry open balances with partners abroad. A partner’s default, a seizure of cash or a frozen trade shipment can break the chain of settlement.

How Governments Regulate Hawala

Because hawala transfers bypass banks, they also bypass the licensing, customer identification and reporting rules built into banking. Governments have responded in different ways.

India. Two laws are central. The Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) governs foreign exchange dealings and defines prohibited transactions, including acquiring assets outside India through unauthorized channels. The Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) applies when hawala is used to move proceeds of crime. Under FEMA, a contravention can bring:

• a penalty of up to three times the sum involved where the amount can be quantified, or up to ₹2 lakh where it cannot;
• confiscation of the currency, securities or other property connected to the violation;
• civil imprisonment if the penalty is not paid.

Money laundering under the PMLA is a criminal offense carrying a prison term of three to seven years, and up to ten years in certain narcotics-related cases.

Pakistan. Informal hawala is prohibited, and the law specifies which entities may handle remittances and currency exchange. Money changers were required to register and qualify as foreign exchange companies within two years. Those that did not register were barred from operating.

Afghanistan. More than 300 money exchangers organized themselves into a self-regulatory body that sets rules its members must follow. Bringing unregistered exchangers under that framework has proved harder.

United States. Hawala as a method is not banned outright, but anyone who transmits money as a business must register with FinCEN as a money services business, hold the required state money transmitter licenses, and follow anti-money laundering rules on record-keeping and reporting. Running an unlicensed money transmitting business is a federal crime.

United Arab Emirates, including Dubai. Hawala is legal when the provider is registered with the Central Bank of the UAE and complies with its rules, which include record-keeping and reporting obligations.

Hawala vs. Related Concepts

Hawala vs. foreign remittance. These are not the same thing. A remittance is the purpose: money sent home, typically by a migrant worker. Hawala is one channel for sending it. Banks, licensed money transfer companies and mobile wallets are other channels. A remittance sent by bank wire is fully recorded in the formal system, while one sent through an informal hawaladar is not.

Hawala vs. a bank wire. A wire debits the sender’s account and credits the recipient’s account through correspondent banks or payment networks, with identity checks and records at each step. Hawala involves no accounts for the customers. The payout comes from the receiving broker’s own funds, and the broker-to-broker debt is settled separately.

Hawala vs. hundi. Hundi is a related South Asian system historically built on written instruments similar to bills of exchange. The terms are often used interchangeably for informal value transfer. In India, “hawala” is the more common name for the illegal practice.

Hawala vs. mobile money and fintech. Mobile money services such as M-Pesa in parts of Africa are sometimes compared to hawala because both serve people outside traditional banking, use agent networks to pay out cash, and move value through balances rather than physical currency. The difference is regulation: licensed mobile money providers operate under financial supervision, verify customers and keep records. Fintech firms in underbanked regions have borrowed the agent-network idea while adding that compliance layer, and a digital wallet stores a balance with a regulated provider rather than relying on an unwritten debt between brokers.

The Bottom Line

Hawala matters most to migrant workers and families who lack bank accounts or live where banks are scarce. It can be fast and cheap, but customers depend entirely on a broker's reputation and may face legal penalties where informal hawala is banned. Anyone considering it should check local law, deal only with registered providers where rules require them, and compare the amount actually received with the total paid.