What Is Macroeconomics? Definition, History, and Schools of Thought

Search Fintrev

Search our guides, reviews and glossary.

Macroeconomics is the branch of economics that studies an economy as a whole: total output, the overall price level, employment, national income, interest rates and trade between countries. Where microeconomics asks why a household buys one product instead of another, macroeconomics asks why an entire economy grows, why it falls into recession, why prices across the board rise, and why millions of people can be out of work at the same time. The field has three central concerns: economic growth, unemployment and inflation. Its research divides into two broad areas, long-term growth and shorter-term swings known as the business cycle.

What Macroeconomics Studies

Macroeconomics treats the economy as a system of aggregates. Instead of the price of one good, it looks at the price level of everything consumers buy. Instead of one firm’s sales, it looks at the total value of goods and services produced in a country. Instead of one worker’s job search, it looks at the unemployment rate.

The questions it tries to answer are broad:

• What determines how much an economy produces, and why do some economies grow faster than others?
• What causes unemployment, and why does it rise sharply in some years?
• What causes inflation, and why does the general price level sometimes fall?
• How do interest rates, exchange rates and trade balances interact with domestic output?
• What can governments and central banks do to stabilize the economy, and what are the side effects?

Output is often described as the single most important concept in macroeconomics. Output is the total amount of goods and services a country produces in a period, and it ties the other variables together. Employment depends on how much is being produced, income is generated by production, and inflation reflects the relationship between spending and the economy’s capacity to produce. The factors of production (land, labor, capital and entrepreneurship) set the limits of that capacity.

How Macroeconomics Works

Macroeconomists combine measurement with models. Statistical agencies collect data on production, prices, jobs and trade. Economists then build models that describe how those variables relate, for example how a change in interest rates affects borrowing, spending, output and eventually prices, and use them to forecast and evaluate policy.

The expenditure identity

The most widely used framework for measuring output is the expenditure approach to GDP:

GDP = C + I + G + (X − M)

where:

• C is household consumption spending
• I is business investment in equipment, structures and inventories, plus residential construction
• G is government purchases of goods and services (transfer payments such as pensions are excluded because they do not buy current output)
• X − M is net exports: exports minus imports

This is an accounting identity, not a theory. It holds by definition because every dollar of final output is bought by someone. Its value lies in showing where spending comes from and which component is driving a change.

Hypothetical example. Suppose a small economy reports the following for one year: consumption of $700 billion, investment of $180 billion, government purchases of $200 billion, exports of $120 billion and imports of $150 billion. Net exports are $120 billion − $150 billion = −$30 billion, so:

GDP = 700 + 180 + 200 + (−30) = $1,050 billion

If, the next year, households cut consumption by $35 billion and nothing else changes, measured GDP falls to $1,015 billion, a decline of about 3.3%. A macroeconomist would then ask what follows. Lower consumption means lower revenue for businesses, which may cut hiring or investment, which in turn reduces income and spending further. The identity records the first-round effect, and models attempt to estimate the knock-on effects.

Nominal vs. real figures

A rise in GDP can come from producing more or from charging higher prices for the same output. Macroeconomists separate the two:

• Nominal GDP values output at current prices.
• Real GDP values output at constant prices from a base period, removing the effect of inflation.

A common approximation links them: real growth ≈ nominal growth − inflation. If nominal GDP rises 6% in a year and the price level rises 4%, real output grew roughly 2%. The distinction matters for every macro comparison across time. Price-level measures such as the Consumer Price Index and the GDP deflator supply the inflation adjustment.

Money and the price level

The other building block is the role of money. The equation of exchange, associated with Irving Fisher, states:

M × V = P × Y

where M is the money supply, V is velocity (how many times a unit of money is spent in a period), P is the price level and Y is real output. Like the GDP identity, it holds by definition. Different schools read it differently. If velocity and output are stable, faster money growth shows up mainly as higher prices, which is the core of the monetarist view. If velocity shifts unpredictably, the link between money and prices becomes looser.

Macroeconomics vs. Microeconomics

Microeconomics studies the choices of individual actors (consumers, workers, firms and industries) and how they interact in specific markets through supply, demand and prices. Macroeconomics studies the totals that emerge when all of those choices add up.

The two are connected. National output is the sum of what individual firms produce, and interest rates set at the macro level influence each household’s decision to borrow. Yet aggregates do not always behave like scaled-up individual choices, and sometimes they move the opposite way.

The best-known example is the paradox of thrift, which Keynes discussed. For a single household, saving more is a sound way to build wealth. If every household tries to save more at once, total spending falls. Businesses sell less, cut hours and wages, and incomes drop. With lower incomes, households may end up unable to save as much as they intended, and the economy as a whole is poorer.

Hypothetical example. In an economy where consumers spend $700 billion a year, every household decides to save an extra 5% of its spending. Consumption drops by $35 billion. That $35 billion was revenue for shops, restaurants and manufacturers, and part of it was wages for their employees. As those workers’ incomes fall, they cut their own spending, and the original decline spreads. A choice that is sensible for one household produces a weaker result when everyone makes it together.

Concepts such as opportunity cost apply in both fields, but macroeconomics applies them to society-wide trade-offs, for example between public spending and private investment.

History of Macroeconomics

Many macroeconomic questions are older than the name. Economists have studied unemployment, prices, growth and trade since the discipline took shape in the 1700s. Adam Smith and later John Stuart Mill wrote about issues that would now be classed as macroeconomics, including the sources of national wealth and the role of money.

Before Keynes, economists generally did not treat microeconomics and macroeconomics as separate subjects. The same laws of supply and demand that set prices in individual markets were thought to interact across markets and bring the whole economy into balance. Léon Walras formalized this idea as general equilibrium. Economists such as Knut Wicksell, Irving Fisher and Ludwig von Mises explained how goods markets connect to economy-wide variables like the price level and interest rates through money’s role as a medium of exchange.

The Great Depression of the 1930s challenged that framework. Goods went unsold and workers stayed unemployed for years, which was hard to reconcile with the idea that markets clear on their own. Keynes’s General Theory, published in 1936, argued that total demand could stay too low for long periods and that government action could close the gap. Modern macroeconomics is usually dated from that book, and the term “macroeconomics” itself came into use in the 1940s.

Through the rest of the 20th century, Keynesian economics branched into and competed with several other schools. Postwar governments leaned heavily on Keynesian demand management. The high inflation of the 1970s gave momentum to monetarism and later to the New Classical approach. New Keynesian economics then combined Keynesian conclusions with more rigorous foundations in individual behavior.

Macroeconomic Schools of Thought

The schools differ mostly on two questions: how quickly prices and wages adjust, and whether government or central bank intervention improves or worsens outcomes.

Classical

Classical economists held that prices, wages and interest rates are flexible, so markets tend to clear unless government policy prevents them from doing so. These ideas build on Adam Smith’s work. “Classical” is less a formal school than a label: Karl Marx used it first, and Keynes later applied it to the earlier economists he disagreed with.

Keynesian

Keynesian economics, based mainly on Keynes’s work, marked the start of macroeconomics as a field distinct from microeconomics. Keynesians see aggregate demand (total spending in the economy) as the main driver of unemployment and the business cycle. They argue that rigidities, especially sticky prices and wages, prevent supply and demand from clearing quickly, so an economy can stay below full employment for a long time.

Their policy prescription is active management. With fiscal policy, governments spend more or tax less in recessions to lift demand, and do the reverse in booms. With monetary policy, the central bank lowers interest rates to encourage lending and raises them to restrain it.

Monetarist

Monetarism, credited mainly to Milton Friedman, developed within and extended Keynesian models. Monetarists argue that monetary policy is generally a more effective and desirable tool than fiscal policy for managing aggregate demand. They also stress its limits: because policy works with long and variable lags, attempts to fine-tune the economy can do harm. Monetarists therefore favor stable rules, such as steady growth in the money supply or a commitment to stable inflation, over discretionary moves.

New Classical

The New Classical school, like the New Keynesian school, set out to give macroeconomics microeconomic foundations and resolve contradictions between the two fields. Its models assume that individuals maximize their own utility and form rational expectations, meaning they use all available information when anticipating the future, including the likely effects of policy.

From those assumptions, New Classical economists conclude that unemployment is largely voluntary, that discretionary fiscal policy tends to destabilize the economy, and that inflation can be controlled through monetary policy.

New Keynesian

New Keynesians also build on microeconomic foundations and accept that households and firms form rational expectations. They maintain, however, that markets suffer from real failures, notably sticky prices and wages. Because of that stickiness, economies do not adjust instantly to shocks, and fiscal and monetary policy can improve outcomes. Much of modern central bank modeling draws on this approach.

Austrian

The Austrian School is older than Keynesian economics and has seen renewed interest. Its theories focus mostly on individual behavior, and like the classical economists, Austrians never strictly separated micro and macro. Their Austrian business cycle theory applies that view to economy-wide swings: when central banks and the banking system hold interest rates below the level savers and borrowers would set on their own, businesses start projects that cannot be sustained. The result is a broadly synchronized boom across markets followed by a bust when those investments prove unprofitable. In this theory, money and banking link individual markets to each other and across time.

Macroeconomic Indicators

Indicators track the field’s two research areas: long-term growth and short-term fluctuations in income and employment.

Economic growth

Economic growth is an increase in an economy’s aggregate production, usually measured as the change in real GDP. Macroeconomists study what promotes or slows growth (investment in capital, growth of the labor force, education, technology, institutions) so that policy can support rising living standards over time. For cross-country comparisons, economists often adjust output for differences in price levels using purchasing power parity.

In the U.S., the Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes data on GDP, consumer spending, income and saving, output by industry, international trade and investment, prices and inflation, fixed assets, employment, and government spending and revenue.

The business cycle

Around the long-term growth trend, output and employment fluctuate. These fluctuations move through four phases in order: expansion, peak, recession (contraction) and trough, after which a new expansion begins. Plotted over time, they form the business cycle.

In the U.S., the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is the body that dates the cycle. It determines when expansions and recessions begin and end, drawing on measures of output and income such as GDP and gross national income. Its announcements typically come well after the turning point, because it waits for enough data to confirm one.

How Policy Influences the Macroeconomy

Influencing an entire economy is slower and harder than changing individual behavior, so countries assign the job to dedicated institutions. The two main levers are fiscal policy and monetary policy.

Fiscal policy is the government’s use of spending and taxation. Raising spending or cutting taxes adds to aggregate demand, and the reverse withdraws it. Budget decisions are made by legislatures and governments, which means fiscal policy can be slow to change and is shaped by politics as well as economics.

Monetary policy is run by the central bank. In the U.S., the Federal Reserve has a dual mandate set by Congress: maximum employment and stable prices. Its main tools include:

• The federal funds rate target range: the Fed sets a target range for the rate banks charge each other for overnight loans, which influences borrowing costs throughout the economy.
• Interest on reserve balances and open market operations: paying interest on reserves held at the Fed and buying and selling securities to manage the supply of reserves and keep the federal funds rate inside its target range.
• Liquidity backstops: the discount window, repurchase agreement facilities and central bank liquidity swaps with selected foreign central banks.

Hawkish and dovish describe a central bank’s leaning toward fighting inflation or supporting growth. Which school of thought is influential at a given time affects how governments approach taxation, regulation and spending, and how central banks set rates.

How Businesses and Investors Use Macroeconomics

Macroeconomic conditions feed directly into interest rates, corporate earnings and asset prices. A company’s sales depend on its customers’ income, its borrowing costs on central bank policy and its export revenue on exchange rates and foreign demand. Businesses use forecasts to plan production, hiring and expansion: a retailer expecting slower consumer spending may delay opening new stores, and a manufacturer expecting higher interest rates may finance equipment purchases sooner.

Investors watch GDP growth, inflation and unemployment because they shape the outlook for earnings and the rates used to value future cash flows. Higher expected inflation, for example, tends to push up bond yields, which lowers the present value of fixed payments. Broad benchmarks like the S&P 500 aggregate hundreds of companies, so their performance is closely tied to the overall economy. Knowing which policies are likely helps investors interpret volatility and policy announcements, although it does not let them predict market moves reliably.

Limitations of Macroeconomics

Macroeconomic theory has real limits, and they explain why economists disagree so often.

• Simplifying assumptions. Models are built with only the variables needed to isolate a relationship. Economists often rely on ceteris paribus (“all else being equal”), holding everything else fixed to study one link, such as interest rates and investment. In the real economy, other variables rarely stay still.
• Missing details. Theories often leave out taxation, regulation, transaction costs and institutional detail that matter in practice.
• Behavior that resists measurement. Social preferences, confidence and political choices influence outcomes but do not fit neatly into equations.
• Data revisions and lags. Indicators such as GDP are estimated, published with a delay and revised later. Policymakers act on incomplete information, and the effects of their decisions can take many months to appear.
• Shocks and structural change. Forecasts have performed poorly during periods of severe stress, when economies face unprecedented shocks or change faster than historical relationships can capture.
• Competing schools. Because the evidence can support more than one interpretation, economists from different schools can look at the same data and recommend opposite policies.

The Bottom Line

Macroeconomics matters to businesses planning production and hiring and to investors weighing earnings and interest rates. Tracking GDP, inflation and unemployment helps them interpret policy announcements and market volatility, although it does not make market moves predictable. Because data are revised, policy works with lags and schools of thought disagree, forecasts deserve caution, especially during unusual shocks.