What Are Giffen Goods? Definition and Examples
By Markets & Investing DeskUpdated Nov 10, 2026

Definition
A Giffen good is a staple, inferior good whose quantity demanded rises when its price rises, because the higher price cuts real income and pushes buyers toward more of it.
Key takeaways
- The income effect must overwhelm the substitution effect, so the good must take up a big share of the budget.
- In the hypothetical, rice rising from $1 to $1.25 per kilogram lifts purchases from 20 kg to 24 kg.
- A 2007 field experiment by Jensen and Miller found Giffen behavior for rice in Hunan, with weaker results for wheat.
- Veblen goods sell more at higher prices for status reasons, and their buyers are typically well-off.
A Giffen good is a staple, inferior good whose quantity demanded rises when its price rises and falls when its price falls, over at least some range of prices. It runs against the ordinary law of demand because a price increase makes the buyer poorer in real terms, and that loss of purchasing power pushes the buyer toward more of the cheap staple, not less. The concept is named after the Scottish statistician and economist Sir Robert Giffen, to whom Alfred Marshall attributed the observation in Principles of Economics.
How Giffen Goods Work
Every price change has two effects on what a consumer buys.
- Substitution effect: when a good becomes more expensive relative to others, the buyer shifts toward the alternatives. This effect always works against the good whose price rose.
- Income effect: a higher price reduces how much the buyer’s budget can purchase. For a normal good, lower real income means buying less. For an inferior good, lower real income means buying more, because the buyer drops pricier options and falls back on the cheap one.
For most inferior goods the substitution effect still wins, and demand falls as price rises. A Giffen good is the special case where the income effect overwhelms substitution. That is why the good must take up a big part of the budget: a price increase on something you spend little on barely changes your real income.
Economists express this with the Slutsky equation, which splits the total response of demand to a price change:
Δx/Δp = (substitution effect) − x × (Δx/Δm)
Here x is the quantity bought, p is the price and m is income. The substitution term is negative. If the good is inferior, Δx/Δm is negative, so the second term becomes positive. When x is large (heavy reliance on the good) and the inferior-good response is strong, the positive term can exceed the negative one, and the total effect of price on quantity becomes positive.
Interpreting Giffen Goods
On a graph, the Giffen demand curve slopes upward over that range, so its price elasticity of demand is positive there. It does not slope upward at every price. At very low prices the household is comfortable and behaves normally; at very high prices it simply cannot afford enough of anything. Giffen behavior sits in the middle band, where the household is poor enough to depend on the staple but not so poor that it has nothing left to cut.
Example of Giffen Goods
Hypothetical example. A household spends $30 a week on food and needs a fixed number of calories to get by. Rice costs $1 per kilogram and meat costs $5 per kilogram. The household buys 20 kg of rice ($20) and 2 kg of meat ($10). Meat makes the diet bearable, but rice supplies most of the calories.
Now rice rises to $1.25 per kilogram. Keeping 20 kg of rice would cost $25, leaving only $5 for 1 kg of meat, and that combination falls short of the calories the family needs. The cheapest way to stay fed is to give up meat entirely and spend the full $30 on rice, which buys 24 kg. Rice consumption rises from 20 kg to 24 kg because rice got more expensive.
The example assumes a fixed budget, a hard calorie requirement and no other cheap food. Remove any of those and the result can disappear.
Historical Evidence
Marshall cited Giffen’s account of poor British laborers: when bread prices rose, they could afford less meat and ate more bread. The claim was questioned in 1947 by George Stigler in “Notes on the History of the Giffen Paradox,” which found little support for the bread story in the historical record. Potatoes during the Irish famine of the 1840s are another frequently cited case, but that example is also disputed, partly because the potato supply itself collapsed.
The most convincing evidence comes from a field experiment by Harvard economists Robert Jensen and Nolan Miller, first circulated in 2007. They gave randomly selected poor households vouchers that subsidized their staple food: rice in Hunan and wheat in Gansu. In Hunan, lowering the effective price of rice led households to buy less rice, and removing the subsidy had the opposite effect, which is strong evidence of Giffen behavior. The results for wheat in Gansu were weaker. Randomization let the study isolate the price effect from changes in income or tastes, the problem that weakened earlier historical claims.
Why Are Giffen Goods Important?
Giffen goods show that the law of demand is an empirical regularity, not a logical necessity: consumer theory allows upward-sloping demand under specific conditions.
The concept also matters for policy. If a staple behaves as a Giffen good for the poorest households, a price subsidy can reduce consumption of that staple while improving diet quality, as households redirect the freed-up money to more varied food. A price spike, by contrast, can deepen dependence on the cheapest calories.
Limitations of Giffen Goods
- Rarity: confirmed cases are rare because the required conditions seldom occur together.
- Hard to measure: in market data, incomes, supply shocks and other prices change alongside the price, so a price rise that comes with higher purchases does not prove Giffen behavior.
- Narrow range: the effect applies only within a band of prices and for particular groups. Market-wide demand for the same good can still slope downward if wealthier buyers respond normally.
Giffen Goods vs. Similar Concepts
Inferior goods. Every Giffen good is inferior, but most inferior goods are not Giffen goods. Store-brand staples or bus travel may be bought less as incomes rise, yet their demand still falls when their price rises.
Veblen goods. Luxury items such as fine wine or designer goods can attract more buyers at higher prices because the price itself signals status. The cause is social desirability, not a squeeze on income, and buyers are typically well-off.
Expectation-driven demand. Buyers sometimes purchase more of a stock, a currency or a commodity as its price climbs because they expect further gains. That is an expectations-driven shift in demand, not a Giffen effect, which describes how a fixed budget responds to a price change.
The Bottom Line
Giffen goods matter most to economists and policymakers studying very poor households that depend on one cheap staple. The effect is rare, appears only within a narrow band of prices, and is hard to prove from market data. Where it does occur, subsidizing the staple can lower its consumption while improving diets, and a price spike can deepen reliance on the cheapest calories.















