What Are FAANG Stocks? Companies Explained

Search Fintrev

Search our guides, reviews and glossary.

FAANG is an acronym for the stocks of five large U.S. technology companies: Facebook (now Meta), Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google (now Alphabet). The term is market shorthand, not an index, fund or official classification. It groups companies that, through the 2010s, combined fast growth, dominant consumer brands and very large market capitalizations, and that came to move the broad U.S. market in a way few individual stocks can.

What FAANG Stands For

Each letter maps to one company. Two of the original names have since changed:

Alphabet is the only member with two listed share classes. GOOGL is Class A stock, which carries voting rights, and GOOG is Class C stock, which does not. Both represent the same company, so the choice affects voting, not economic exposure.

Where the Term Came From

The group started as four stocks. Bob Lang, a colleague of Jim Cramer at TheStreet and its Real Money service, picked out Facebook, Amazon, Netflix and Google and coined “FANG.” Cramer, who credits Lang with the idea, popularized the term on CNBC’s Mad Money in 2013, describing the companies as totally dominant in their markets.

Apple was added in 2017, producing the second “A” and the five-letter FAANG. Apple was already one of the world’s largest companies at the time, so its inclusion shifted the label from “hot growth names” toward “the giant platforms that dominate U.S. tech.”

How FAANG Stocks Move the Market

The group matters beyond its own shareholders because of market-cap weighting. The S&P 500 weights each company by its float-adjusted market capitalization, so the largest companies have the most influence on the index level. All five FAANG companies are members and several rank among the biggest U.S. companies, so moves in a handful of tech stocks can shape the headline reading of “the market” on a given day.

The same logic applies to the Nasdaq-100, which is also cap-weighted and where these companies carry heavy weights. It applies far less to the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which is price-weighted, so a company’s influence there depends on its share price rather than its total value (and not every FAANG company is a Dow member).

Worked example: concentration in a cap-weighted index

Hypothetical figures, for illustrating the mechanics only.

Assume an index has a total market capitalization of $50 trillion, and the five FAANG companies together are worth $10 trillion.

• FAANG weight = $10 trillion ÷ $50 trillion = 20% of the index.
• Suppose the five stocks fall 10% in a day while every other stock is flat.
• Index impact ≈ 20% × (−10%) = −2%.

If instead the other 495 companies rise 1% on average while FAANG is flat, the index gains about 80% × 1% = 0.8%. A 10% move in five stocks swings the index more than a 1% move across 495 companies, which is why concentration is a recurring concern.

The example also shows a common portfolio overlap. An investor who owns an S&P 500 index fund and also buys FAANG stocks individually holds those companies twice. In the hypothetical above, putting 80% of a portfolio in the index fund and 20% in the five stocks directly gives total FAANG exposure of 0.8 × 20% + 20% = 36%, not 20%.

Why Investors Follow FAANG Stocks

Several features made the group popular:

• Track records and scale. The five companies grew into some of the largest businesses in the world, with leading positions in social media, ecommerce and cloud services, consumer hardware, streaming, and search and advertising.
• Brand recognition. Most investors use at least one of their products, which makes the businesses easier to understand than many industrial or financial companies.
• Liquidity. All five are heavily traded, so shares are easy to buy and sell through any brokerage, and they appear in many popular index funds and ETFs.
• Institutional interest. Large investment firms hold these stocks for their perceived strength, growth or momentum, which adds to how closely the market watches them.

The Valuation Debate

Whether FAANG stocks are overvalued has been argued for as long as the label has existed. Supporters say high prices reflect real fundamentals: large user bases, strong revenue and earnings, and durable market positions. Critics argue that even excellent businesses can be poor investments if the price already assumes years of strong growth, and some investors wait for pullbacks rather than buying at any price. Bubble concerns grew in 2018, when the tech stocks that had driven market gains lost momentum.

There is no single answer for the group because the five companies are valued differently. Comparing each stock’s P/E ratio with its own history and with its earnings growth, using earnings per share (EPS) trends, says more than treating FAANG as one asset.

Limitations of the FAANG Label

• No official membership. Nobody maintains or rebalances FAANG, so it does not add rising companies or drop shrinking ones.
• It is not the tech sector. Under the GICS classification used by S&P, Apple sits in information technology, Amazon in consumer discretionary, and Meta, Alphabet and Netflix in communication services.
• Uneven sizes. Netflix has historically been far smaller by market capitalization than Apple, Amazon or Alphabet, so it contributes much less to index moves than its equal billing in the acronym suggests.
• Different businesses, different risks. Advertising, retail logistics, hardware and subscription streaming respond to different economic forces. Treating the five as a single trade hides those differences.
• Volatility. Large, liquid stocks can still swing sharply, and those swings feed directly into index funds held by investors who never chose them individually.

FAANG vs. Similar Labels

Because FAANG froze a moment in time, newer acronyms have tried to update it:

• FAAMG: Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft and Google. It drops Netflix and adds Microsoft.
• MAMAA: Microsoft, Apple, Meta, Amazon and Alphabet. Cramer suggested it after Facebook’s rename to Meta.
• MAANG: Meta, Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Google. It is the same five companies with Facebook’s new initial, used mostly in tech hiring discussions.
• Magnificent Seven: Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Nvidia and Tesla. The term was popularized in 2023 and keeps four FAANG names while dropping Netflix.

Microsoft is not a FAANG stock. The acronym was built to describe the high-growth platforms of the 2010s, and by then Microsoft was viewed as an older, mature company. Its later growth is why it appears in most successor labels.

Outside investing, “FAANG company” is also career shorthand for a top-tier tech employer, often stretched loosely to other large firms. In that sense it describes prestige and pay, not stock membership.

FAQs

The Bottom Line

FAANG matters to anyone who owns an S&P 500 or Nasdaq-100 index fund, because cap weighting gives these few companies outsized influence on returns. Investors who also buy the stocks individually should check their combined exposure, which can be far higher than it looks. Judging each company on its own valuation and business risks tells you more than treating the five as one trade.