Unraveling the 2008 Stock Market Crash: Causes and Aftermath

Search Fintrev

Search our guides, reviews and glossary.

The 2008 stock market crash reached its most violent phase in September and October 2008. Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy on September 15, the Dow Jones Industrial Average posted its then-largest one-day point drop on September 29, and the week of October 6 to 10 became the worst week in the Dow’s history up to that point. The crash itself was longer than those two months. U.S. stocks peaked on October 9, 2007, slid through most of 2008, collapsed that autumn, and did not bottom until March 9, 2009, when the S&P 500 closed at 676.53.

The underlying cause was a housing bubble built on risky mortgage lending. Those mortgages were packaged into securities, insured with lightly regulated derivatives, and financed by banks that had borrowed heavily against thin capital. When home prices fell, the losses spread through that chain faster than regulators or markets could contain them. The result was the worst financial crisis and recession in the United States since the Great Depression.

When did the stock market crash in 2008?

There is no single crash date in 2008, unlike October 19, 1987 or the October 1929 sessions. Instead, the decline came in stages, and which date you pick depends on what you mean by “the crash.”

How much did the S&P drop in 2008? Over calendar year 2008, the S&P 500 fell about 38.5% on a price basis, its worst annual decline since the 1930s. The Dow lost about 34% for the year. The peak-to-trough figures are larger because the decline started in late 2007 and continued into early 2009:

• S&P 500: (676.53 ÷ 1,565.15) − 1 ≈ −56.8%
• Dow: (6,547.05 ÷ 14,164.53) − 1 ≈ −53.8%

These are price returns using closing values and exclude dividends. An investor who reinvested dividends lost somewhat less, but the scale of the drawdown was similar.

How fast did the market drop? The first year of decline was gradual. By early July 2008, nine months after the peak, the Dow had fallen below 11,000, a loss of about 22%. Then the pace changed. Between the Lehman filing on September 15 and the intraday low of about 7,882 on October 10, the Dow lost roughly another 28% in less than four weeks. Volatility ran in both directions: on October 13, 2008, the Dow rose about 936 points, at the time its largest one-day point gain, and two days later it fell about 733 points.

What caused the 2008 crash

1. Cheap money and the housing bubble

After the dot-com bust and the 2001 recession, the Federal Reserve cut its federal funds target to 1% by mid-2003 and held it there for about a year. Low short-term rates made adjustable mortgages cheap and pushed investors to look for higher yields elsewhere. Home prices, which had already been rising, accelerated. National measures of U.S. home prices peaked in 2006.

Rising prices shaped how lenders, borrowers and investors judged risk. A loan that could not be repaid from income still looked safe as long as the house could be sold or refinanced at a higher value. As long as prices kept climbing, defaults stayed low, and the low defaults appeared to confirm that the loans were safe.

2. Subprime lending

“Subprime” mortgages went to borrowers with weak credit histories, high debt relative to income, or both. A related category, “Alt-A” loans, went to borrowers with better credit but little documentation of income or assets, which earned some of them the name “liar loans.” Underwriting loosened through the early and mid-2000s. Down payments shrank, income verification was often skipped, and loans were approved on the assumption that rising home values would cover any problem.

Government policy encouraged wider homeownership in the 1990s and 2000s, and the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 is often blamed for the crisis. The stronger case is that private lenders ran far beyond that push. Many of the riskiest subprime loans came from mortgage companies not covered by the Act at all, which originated loans to sell them, not to hold them.

3. Adjustable-rate mortgages that reset

The most fragile products were adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) with low introductory payments. These included “2/28” loans with a teaser rate for two years, interest-only ARMs, and payment-option ARMs that allowed a payment so low the loan balance could grow. After the introductory period ended, the rate reset higher and the payment could jump sharply.

Hypothetical example: A borrower takes a $200,000 loan paying interest only at 4% for two years, about $667 a month. At reset, the rate moves to 8% and the loan begins amortizing over the remaining 28 years, so the payment rises to about $1,494, more than double. The shock is the same whether home prices rise or fall; what changes is the way out. In a rising market, the borrower can refinance or sell at a profit. In a falling market, the borrower may owe more than the house is worth (“underwater”), so neither option works and default becomes likely.

That is why the resets mattered so much once prices stopped rising. A large wave of ARMs was scheduled to reset in 2007 and 2008, exactly as home values began to fall.

4. Securitization: mortgage-backed securities and CDOs

Lenders sold most of these loans instead of keeping them. Investment banks pooled thousands of mortgages into mortgage-backed securities, which passed borrowers’ payments through to investors. The pools were sliced into tranches. Senior tranches were paid first and got the highest credit ratings, and junior tranches absorbed the first losses in exchange for higher yields.

Lower-rated tranches were then often repackaged into collateralized debt obligations, which were sliced again, and much of each new structure received AAA ratings. “Synthetic” CDOs went a step further: instead of holding mortgage bonds, they referenced them through credit default swaps, so more bets could exist on a pool of mortgages than the pool itself was worth.

The model assumed mortgage defaults across regions would not rise together, so pooling would diversify the risk away. A nationwide price decline broke that assumption. Defaults rose everywhere at once, junior tranches were wiped out, and losses reached securities rated as nearly riskless. Because these instruments were complex and traded rarely, holders often could not say what they were worth, and that uncertainty, more than any single loss, made banks afraid to lend to each other.

Securitization also changed incentives at the start of the chain. A lender paid at origination and then free of the loan had less reason to care whether the borrower could repay. This “originate-to-distribute” model meant underwriting standards weakened at the point where risk entered the system.

5. Credit rating agencies

Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch rated these securities, and many investors, including pension funds and money market funds, could only buy highly rated debt. The agencies were paid by the issuers whose deals they rated, a conflict built into the business model. Their models leaned on short histories of housing data that did not include a national price collapse. As defaults climbed in 2007 and 2008, the agencies downgraded mortgage securities in large batches. Many AAA-rated tranches ended up far below investment grade, which forced sales by investors whose rules required high ratings.

6. Credit default swaps and AIG

A credit default swap works like insurance on a bond. The buyer pays a regular premium, and the seller pays out if the referenced debt defaults. Unlike insurance, the CDS market was largely unregulated, and sellers were not required to hold reserves sized to a worst-case scenario.

American International Group (AIG), through its financial products unit, sold enormous amounts of protection on mortgage-related CDOs, often posting little collateral because of its high credit rating. When the securities fell in value and AIG’s own rating was cut, its contracts required billions in collateral it did not have. So many banks had bought protection from AIG that its failure would have left them exposed to losses they thought they had hedged, which is why the government treated AIG as too important to fail.

7. Leverage and short-term funding

Investment banks such as Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs financed large holdings of long-term, hard-to-sell assets with short-term borrowing, much of it overnight repurchase agreements (repo). In 2004, the SEC changed how it calculated net capital for the largest broker-dealers, allowing them to use their own models, and leverage at these firms rose. By 2007, several ran balance sheets commonly reported at around 30 times equity.

Hypothetical example: A firm with $30 of assets for every $1 of equity loses all of its equity if its assets fall about 3.3% in value (1 ÷ 30). At 12 to 1, the same wipeout takes a decline of about 8.3%. High leverage didn’t create the mortgage losses, but it meant modest losses could make a firm insolvent. Short-term funding made the danger immediate, because lenders could simply refuse to roll over their loans the next morning.

8. Rising consumer debt

Household borrowing grew alongside mortgages. U.S. consumer debt crossed $2 trillion in 2004, roughly double its level less than a decade earlier. Many homeowners also took cash out through refinancing and home equity lines, turning rising house prices into spending. When home values fell, households were left with large debts against shrinking assets and cut spending sharply, which deepened the recession.

9. Regulatory changes and gaps

A run of legal changes over two decades reduced oversight or left new markets outside it:

• Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act (1982): loosened rules for savings and loans and allowed adjustable-rate mortgages to spread.
• Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act (1994): allowed banks to operate across state lines, fueling consolidation into very large national banks.
• Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999): repealed key parts of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, allowing commercial banks, investment banks and insurers to combine under one holding company.
• Commodity Futures Modernization Act (2000): kept most over-the-counter derivatives, including credit default swaps, outside federal regulation.

Beyond specific laws, the 2000s favored “light-touch” supervision that trusted markets to police themselves. No single regulator had a full view of the system. Mortgage brokers, investment bank holding companies, the CDS market and the “shadow banking” system of money funds, repo lenders and off-balance-sheet vehicles fell between agencies or outside them entirely.

10. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government-sponsored enterprises that buy mortgages from lenders, guarantee them and package them into securities. Some critics place them at the center of the crisis. Their record is more mixed.

They did increase purchases of riskier loans, including subprime and Alt-A mortgages, in the mid-2000s, partly to meet affordable-housing goals and partly to win back market share from private securitizers. They also ran with very thin capital relative to their guarantees, and their losses were severe enough that the government placed both in conservatorship in September 2008.

But the most extreme lending came from private lenders and Wall Street “private-label” securitization, which grew rapidly in the early 2000s largely outside the standards Fannie and Freddie applied. The two enterprises added to housing exposure and deepened the crisis, but they did not originate the worst loans or drive the wave of private securities that collapsed first.

How a housing slump became a stock market crash

Losses on subprime mortgages were large but would not by themselves have destroyed the financial system. What turned them into a crash was the way the losses traveled:

1. Falling home prices raised defaults, especially as ARMs reset and underwater borrowers could not refinance.
2. Mortgage securities fell in value, and because they traded rarely, banks had to mark them down using distressed prices or models, which cut reported capital.
3. Leveraged firms lost capital quickly and had to sell assets into falling markets, pushing prices lower for everyone holding similar securities.
4. Short-term lenders pulled back. Repo lenders demanded more collateral or stopped lending, a modern version of a bank run.
5. Counterparty fear spread. No one knew which institutions held the worst assets or had sold the most CDS protection, so banks stopped lending to each other. Interbank rates rose far above policy rates.
6. The credit freeze hit the real economy. Businesses could not roll over commercial paper, consumers lost access to credit, and layoffs accelerated.
7. Stocks repriced for a deep recession, with financial stocks falling furthest and fear spreading to every sector.

This is why the stock market’s worst weeks came in the fall of 2008, more than two years after home prices peaked: the housing decline was the cause, and the run on the financial system made the market crash.

Timeline of the 2008 crash: 2007 to 2009

2007: The subprime meltdown begins

February to April 2007: Subprime lenders began reporting rising defaults. On April 2, New Century Financial, one of the largest subprime lenders, filed for bankruptcy.

June to July 2007: Two Bear Stearns hedge funds heavily invested in subprime-linked securities collapsed and filed for bankruptcy protection on July 31, showing how quickly leveraged mortgage bets could unravel.

August 9, 2007: BNP Paribas froze three investment funds because it could not value their U.S. subprime holdings. Interbank lending tightened sharply, and central banks injected emergency liquidity. Many historians date the start of the global financial crisis to this day.

September 2007: Depositors ran on Northern Rock in the United Kingdom, the first British bank run in well over a century.

December 2007: The U.S. economy entered recession, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research, which made the call a year later. The recession lasted until June 2009.

Early and mid-2008: Cracks become failures

January 2008: Bank of America agreed to buy Countrywide Financial, the nation’s largest mortgage lender, which was struggling with mortgage losses.

March 2008: Bear Stearns ran out of short-term funding within days. In a deal brokered by the government, JPMorgan Chase bought it for $2 per share, later raised to $10, a fraction of its value a year earlier. The Federal Reserve agreed to finance about $29 billion of Bear’s riskier assets to get the deal done. The Fed also opened lending facilities to investment banks for the first time.

July 2008: IndyMac, a large mortgage lender, failed and was taken over by the FDIC on July 11, one of the largest bank failures in U.S. history. Investors also grew alarmed about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

September 2008: The system breaks

September 6 to 7: The federal government placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship under the new Federal Housing Finance Agency. U.S. stocks were down nearly 20% from their October 2007 peak.

September 14 to 15: Efforts to find a buyer for Lehman Brothers failed, and the government declined to back a rescue. Lehman filed for bankruptcy on September 15, at the time the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history, with more than $600 billion in assets. The same weekend, Bank of America agreed to buy Merrill Lynch. The Dow fell about 500 points that day.

September 16: Two shocks hit at once. AIG’s credit rating had been cut, collateral calls on its CDS contracts were mounting, and the Federal Reserve extended an $85 billion loan in exchange for a stake of nearly 80%. The government’s total support for AIG later grew to roughly $180 billion in commitments. The Treasury and Fed ultimately recovered the money with a positive return by the end of 2012.

The same day, the Reserve Primary Fund, one of the oldest money market funds, “broke the buck.” It held Lehman commercial paper that suddenly became nearly worthless, and its net asset value fell to 97 cents per share. Money market funds are built to hold a stable $1 value and were treated as nearly as safe as cash, so a three-cent loss broke the promise the whole industry rested on. Investors pulled money from money funds across the industry, and those funds in turn stopped buying the commercial paper many corporations used to fund payroll and operations.

September 19: The Treasury announced a temporary guarantee program for money market funds to stop the run. The SEC, which days earlier had tightened rules on naked short selling, imposed a temporary ban on short selling of financial company stocks. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson proposed a $700 billion program to buy toxic assets from banks. Stocks rallied hard that week, the last broad rebound before the worst of the crash.

September 21: Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, the last two large independent investment banks, converted into bank holding companies. They accepted Fed supervision in exchange for permanent access to its lending, ending the era of the stand-alone Wall Street investment bank.

September 25: After a roughly 10-day run on deposits, regulators seized Washington Mutual, the largest savings and loan in the country, and sold its banking operations to JPMorgan Chase. It remains the largest bank failure in U.S. history.

September 29: The House of Representatives voted down the first version of the bailout bill, and the Dow fell about 778 points, roughly 7%, its largest one-day point decline at the time. The same day, Wachovia agreed to an emergency sale; Wells Fargo bought it shortly afterward.

October 2008: Panic peaks

October 3: Congress passed a revised bill, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which created TARP with up to $700 billion. The president signed it the same day. It did not stop the selling.

October 6 to 10: The Dow closed below 10,000 for the first time in about four years on October 6 and fell every day that week, losing about 18%. Global markets crashed in tandem, Iceland’s major banks collapsed that month, and central banks around the world, including the Fed, announced a coordinated rate cut on October 8.

Mid-October: The Treasury changed course and used TARP money to inject capital directly into banks by buying preferred stock, instead of buying troubled assets. Nine large banks received the first $125 billion. The FDIC guaranteed new bank debt and expanded deposit insurance.

Late 2008 to 2009: Toward the bottom

November 2008: The Fed announced it would buy mortgage-backed securities and agency debt, the start of what became known as quantitative easing. The government also extended further support to Citigroup.

December 16, 2008: The Fed cut its federal funds target to a range of 0% to 0.25%. The effective rate, about 5.26% in mid-2007, was about 0.16% by year-end. The economy was contracting fast, credit had frozen, and deflation had become a real threat.

February 2009: Congress passed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a fiscal stimulus of about $787 billion. Regulators also began “stress tests” of the 19 largest banks.

March 9, 2009: Stocks hit their bear-market lows and began a long recovery, helped by the May 2009 stress test results, which reassured investors that the largest banks had enough capital or could raise it.

June 2009: The recession officially ended, although unemployment kept rising until October.

Did Wall Street deceive Americans during the housing crisis?

Investigations and settlements after the crisis did not show one coordinated plot, but they documented repeated misconduct at several points in the mortgage chain.

At the borrower level: Many lenders steered borrowers into loans with payment terms they did not understand, approved loans without checking income, and in some cases inflated borrowers’ incomes or home appraisals to get deals through. Brokers were often paid more for placing borrowers in higher-rate loans than they qualified for.

At the investor level: Banks that packaged mortgages into securities made representations about the quality of the underlying loans. The Justice Department later reached record settlements over those representations, including about $13 billion with JPMorgan Chase in 2013 and about $16.65 billion with Bank of America in 2014, covering conduct at those banks and at firms they had acquired such as Bear Stearns, Washington Mutual, Countrywide and Merrill Lynch. In 2010, Goldman Sachs paid $550 million to settle SEC charges that it had misled investors in a synthetic CDO called Abacus by not disclosing that a hedge fund betting against the deal had helped select the mortgages in it.

At the ratings level: Standard & Poor’s paid about $1.375 billion in 2015, and Moody’s about $864 million in 2017, to settle government claims related to their ratings of mortgage securities in the years before the crisis.

After the crash: Mortgage servicers processed foreclosures using “robo-signed” documents that employees had not reviewed. That practice led to the roughly $25 billion National Mortgage Settlement in 2012 with five large servicers.

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, which Congress created to investigate the causes, concluded in its January 2011 report that the crisis was avoidable. It cited widespread failures in regulation, risk management at major firms, excessive borrowing and a breakdown in accountability and ethics.

Was the housing market manipulated?

Not in the sense of a group deliberately setting home prices. Those were driven by easy credit, speculation and expectations that prices would keep rising. But the market was distorted by false information: inflated appraisals, misstated borrower incomes, misrepresented loan pools and inflated ratings. Those distortions let far more credit flow into housing than accurate information would have allowed, making the bubble larger and the crash worse. Betting against mortgage securities was legal in itself. The Abacus case turned on investors not being told that the other side had helped choose the mortgages.

Long-term impacts of the 2008 crisis

On households

The damage lasted long after the stock market bottomed. By 2010, about 8.7 million American jobs had been lost. Unemployment peaked at 10% in October 2009 and stayed elevated for years, and many workers who lost jobs never regained their earlier earnings. Roughly 10 million households lost their homes to foreclosure in the years that followed. U.S. household net worth fell by an estimated $16 trillion. By one estimate, the average household lost about $30,000 in home value and $70,000 in stock wealth.

On the housing market

The national median house price fell about 29% from July 2006 to January 2009, and prices kept sliding after that. National price indexes bottomed around 2011 to 2012 and did not regain their 2006 peak until around 2016. Markets with the most speculative building and subprime lending, such as parts of Nevada, Arizona, Florida and California, fell much further than the national average.

On regulation

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signed in July 2010, brought the broadest overhaul of U.S. financial regulation since the 1930s. Among its main provisions:

• It created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to oversee mortgages, credit cards and other consumer lending.
• It required lenders to verify a borrower’s ability to repay a mortgage.
• It raised capital and liquidity requirements and made annual stress tests for large banks a permanent feature.
• It introduced the Volcker Rule, limiting banks’ proprietary trading with funds backed by federal deposit insurance.
• It pushed most standardized derivatives, including many swaps, onto central clearinghouses and into reporting regimes.
• It created the Financial Stability Oversight Council to watch for risks across the system and designate firms for tighter supervision.

International regulators added stricter bank capital and liquidity standards under Basel III. Money market fund rules were also tightened, in part to prevent a repeat of the Reserve Primary Fund run.

On monetary policy and markets

The crisis changed how central banks operate. Near-zero rates lasted in the United States until December 2015, and quantitative easing became a standard tool. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac remain in conservatorship more than a decade and a half later. Activity has also moved toward nonbank lenders, private credit and other forms of “shadow banking” that sit outside the tightened bank rules.

How 2008 compares with other crashes

The dot-com crash of 2000 to 2002 was mainly an equity bubble: the Nasdaq fell 78% peak to trough, but the banking system stayed largely intact and the recession that followed was mild. In 2008, the bubble was in credit secured by houses, held with borrowed money by banks, insurers and money funds, so the losses threatened the payments and lending system itself. That is why the downturn was far deeper and recovery took years rather than quarters.

The 1987 crash fell harder in a single day: the Dow lost about 22.6% on October 19, 1987, far more in percentage terms than any 2008 session. But that crash recovered relatively quickly and caused no recession. The 2008 crash was slower, broader and tied to a collapse in the real economy, which makes it closer in character to the early 1930s than to 1987.

FAQs

The Bottom Line

The 2008 crash matters to anyone trying to understand how financial losses spread from housing to the whole economy. Risky mortgages, complex securities, high leverage and short-term funding turned falling home prices into a run on the financial system. Stocks bottomed in March 2009, but households faced lost jobs, foreclosures and reduced wealth for years, and the crisis left lasting rules such as Dodd-Frank, bank stress tests and tighter money market fund standards.