What Is Impairment? Meaning in Company Financials, With Examples
By Markets & Investing DeskUpdated Nov 10, 2026

Definition
Impairment is a permanent write-down of an asset whose carrying amount on the balance sheet exceeds the economic benefit the company can still expect to recover from it.
Key takeaways
- An asset is impaired when its carrying value (cost minus accumulated depreciation or amortization) exceeds what the company can recover from it.
- The write-down reduces the asset on the balance sheet and profit on the income statement in the period it is recognized, but no cash leaves the company.
- Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles are tested at least annually. Other long-lived assets are tested only after a triggering event.
- U.S. GAAP prohibits reversals. IFRS allows them in some cases, but never for goodwill.
Impairment is a permanent reduction in the recorded value of an asset because its carrying amount on the balance sheet is higher than the economic benefit the company can still expect to get from it. The company writes the asset down and records the difference as an impairment loss (also called an impairment charge or impairment expense) on the income statement. The concept applies to physical assets such as factories and equipment, to intangibles such as patents, trademarks and goodwill, and, in a separate framework, to financial assets such as loans.
How Impairment Works
The process has three stages:
- Identify a trigger, such as a sharp drop in the asset’s market price, technological obsolescence, a change in how the asset is used, physical damage, adverse legal or regulatory developments, operating losses tied to the asset, or an expected sale well before the end of its planned life.
- Test recoverability or estimate the recoverable amount, using the method of the applicable framework (see below).
- Measure and record the loss. The asset is written down and the loss is recognized in earnings.
The rules under U.S. GAAP
Long-lived assets held and used, such as property, plant and equipment and finite-lived intangibles, fall under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360. Testing is event-driven and uses two steps:
- Recoverability test: compare the asset’s carrying amount with the undiscounted future cash flows it is expected to generate, including eventual disposal. If they equal or exceed the carrying amount, there is no impairment, even if fair value is lower.
- Measurement: if the asset fails the recoverability test, the loss equals carrying amount minus fair value, often estimated with a discounted cash flow model when no active market exists.
Assets are usually grouped at the lowest level that produces identifiable cash flows, because a single machine rarely generates cash on its own.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles fall under ASC 350 and are tested at least annually and whenever a trigger occurs. A company may start with a qualitative assessment (“step zero”) and run a quantitative test only if fair value is more likely than not below carrying amount. Goodwill is tested at the level of the reporting unit it was assigned to after an acquisition. Under the current simplified approach, the impairment equals the amount by which the unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, capped at the goodwill allocated to that unit.
After a write-down, the reduced carrying amount becomes the asset’s new cost basis for future depreciation or amortization, and the loss cannot be reversed even if the asset’s value recovers.
The rules under IFRS
IFRS handles impairment in IAS 36. Instead of an undiscounted cash flow screen, it compares carrying amount directly with the recoverable amount: the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use (the present value of expected cash flows). Because the comparison uses discounted figures from the start, an asset can be impaired under IFRS while still passing the U.S. GAAP recoverability test. IFRS permits reversal of losses on assets other than goodwill when the estimates improve, up to the carrying amount the asset would have had without the impairment.
Example of Impairment
Equipment write-down (hypothetical)
A manufacturer bought a production line for $800,000 and depreciates it straight-line over eight years with no salvage value, or $100,000 per year. After three years, accumulated depreciation is $300,000 and the carrying amount is $500,000.
A competitor then introduces a process that makes the line far less efficient, which counts as a triggering event. Management’s estimates:
- Undiscounted cash flows from the line over its remaining five years: $420,000
- Fair value based on discounted cash flows: $350,000
Recoverability: $420,000 is below the $500,000 carrying amount, so the asset is not recoverable.
Measurement: $500,000 minus $350,000 = $150,000 impairment loss.
The journal entry:
- Debit Impairment Loss $150,000 (an expense on the income statement)
- Credit the asset account, or a contra-asset such as accumulated impairment, $150,000
The new carrying amount is $350,000. Spread over the remaining five years, annual depreciation falls from $100,000 to $70,000.
Now change one input. If undiscounted cash flows were $520,000 and fair value were $450,000, the asset would pass the U.S. GAAP recoverability test and no loss would be recorded. Under IFRS, assuming value in use of $450,000 and no higher fair value less costs of disposal, the company would record a $50,000 impairment.
Goodwill impairment (hypothetical)
An acquirer pays $50 million for a company whose identifiable net assets have a fair value of $38 million. The $12 million difference is recorded as goodwill and assigned to the reporting unit that absorbs the acquired business.
Two years later, the unit’s carrying amount, including that goodwill, is $60 million. At the annual test, its fair value is estimated at $52 million. The impairment is $8 million, which is within the $12 million goodwill balance, so the full amount is charged. Had fair value fallen to $45 million, the $15 million shortfall would be capped at $12 million, wiping out the goodwill.
Real cases
Goodwill impairment drew wide attention in 2002, when U.S. companies adopted SFAS 142 (now part of ASC 350), which replaced goodwill amortization over periods of up to 40 years with impairment testing. Companies that had overpaid in stock-financed dotcom deals recognized very large charges. AOL Time Warner’s goodwill charges that year ran to tens of billions of dollars. In 2001, Cisco reported a $289 million impairment tied to its roughly $500 million all-stock purchase of Monterey Networks after discontinuing products from that deal. Another wave followed in the Great Recession, as falling stock prices and weaker earnings cut reporting unit values.
Why Impairment Matters to Readers of Financial Statements
Where it shows up
Under U.S. GAAP, impairment losses are generally presented within operating expenses, often as a separate line, reducing operating income and net income. On the balance sheet, the asset, total assets and shareholders’ equity fall by the same amount before tax effects. On the cash flow statement, the charge is added back to net income in operating activities. Analysts often exclude impairments when calculating adjusted EBITDA or assessing free cash flow because the cash was spent when the asset or acquisition was paid for, not when the charge was booked.
What it signals
A charge is backward-looking: the company paid more for an asset or acquired business than it will return. Large goodwill impairments point to an acquisition that did not deliver what management expected, and any impairment is a check on management’s earlier forecasts.
Situations that tend to raise the chance of future charges include:
- A large goodwill balance from past acquisitions
- A share price or market value that has fallen well below book value
- High leverage combined with weak or negative operating cash flow
- Technological or regulatory change affecting the company’s products
- Shifts in demand, pricing or the operating environment
Covenants and capital
Because impairment reduces equity, it can breach debt agreements that require minimum net worth or maximum leverage ratios. That counts as a technical default even though no cash was lost, which can complicate refinancing. In practice, covenant trouble usually involves other weaknesses too, and some agreements exclude non-cash charges from their ratios.
Impairment in Banking and Financial Assets
For banks, impairment usually means credit losses on loans (also called advances) and other financial assets. An impaired loan is one where the lender does not expect to collect all amounts due under the contract. Banks build an allowance (also called a provision or reserve) against expected losses, and the period’s addition to it is the impairment charge or provision for credit losses on the income statement.
U.S. GAAP measures these losses with the current expected credit loss (CECL) model in ASC 326, which estimates lifetime losses from the start. IFRS 9 uses a staged approach: 12-month expected losses for performing assets and lifetime losses once credit risk has increased significantly. Unlike impairment of physical assets, loan allowances move up and down as estimates change, and releases flow back through earnings.
Impairment vs. Related Terms
Impairment vs. depreciation. Depreciation follows a schedule set at acquisition. For example, a $50,000 truck with a five-year life might be depreciated by $10,000 a year regardless of market conditions. Impairment is recognized only when an event shows the remaining carrying amount cannot be recovered. If the truck were badly damaged or barred from city use by new rules, the company would test it and record an immediate loss. Depreciation recurs. Impairment is typically presented as a distinct, nonrecurring item.
Impairment vs. amortization. Amortization is depreciation applied to finite-lived intangibles such as patents. Under U.S. GAAP for public companies, goodwill is not amortized, so impairment is the only mechanism that reduces it. (Private companies may elect an alternative that amortizes goodwill.)
Write-down vs. write-off. A write-down reduces an asset to a lower value. A write-off removes it entirely. Impairment can do either.
Impairment vs. mark-to-market. Mark-to-market accounting revalues certain assets to market price each period in both directions. Impairment adjusts only downward for most assets, and only when a test is failed.
Impairment vs. inventory write-downs. Inventory is not covered by the long-lived asset rules. It is measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value (or market, for some methods), and the resulting loss usually flows through cost of goods sold.
Limitations of Impairment Accounting
Impairment relies heavily on judgment. Fair value estimates for specialized assets or reporting units depend on forecasts of cash flows, growth rates and discount rates, and different valuers can reach different answers. ASC 350 and ASC 805 also give management discretion over how goodwill is allocated among reporting units, which affects whether a test is failed. Disclosures of key assumptions and auditor review of the testing limit that discretion but do not eliminate it.
Timing is also a weakness. Losses are often recognized after the market has priced in the decline, so the charge confirms bad news rather than revealing it. Companies may delay charges or take a single large charge in a weak year (a “big bath”) so future earnings benefit from lower depreciation and amortization. Recurring impairments can signal that earlier estimates were too optimistic.
FAQs
Is goodwill impairment tax deductible?
Generally not when it is recorded for book purposes, because tax rules follow their own schedule. In the United States, goodwill from a taxable asset purchase is typically amortized for tax over 15 years under Section 197, while goodwill from a stock acquisition often has no tax basis at all. The gap usually creates deferred tax effects rather than an immediate tax saving.
The Bottom Line
Impairment matters to investors, analysts and lenders reading financial statements, because a charge shows that a company paid more for an asset or acquisition than it will get back. The loss cuts earnings and equity without using cash, and it can strain debt covenants. Since the figures rest on management's forecasts and often arrive late, readers should check the disclosed assumptions and watch for large goodwill balances and repeated charges.















