What Is Frictional Unemployment? Causes and Impact

Search Fintrev

Search our guides, reviews and glossary.

Frictional unemployment is the short-term unemployment that occurs while people search for work they are able and willing to take, even when suitable jobs exist. It covers workers who quit to find a better position, graduates looking for their first job and people returning to the labor force after time away. The word “frictional” refers to friction in the matching process: workers and employers need time to find each other, compare options and agree on terms. Because that search happens even in a healthy economy, frictional unemployment never falls to zero in a labor market where people are free to change jobs.

How Frictional Unemployment Works

Labor markets do not clear instantly. A worker who leaves a job does not learn about every opening at once, and an employer does not know which applicant fits best until it has advertised, interviewed and made an offer. During that gap an actively searching worker counts as unemployed, even if a suitable job is already open.

Economists formalized this in search and matching theory. Peter Diamond, Dale Mortensen and Christopher Pissarides shared the 2010 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for showing how search costs explain why unemployment and unfilled vacancies coexist. In their framework a worker keeps searching as long as the expected gain from a better offer outweighs the income and time lost, a direct application of opportunity cost.

The Beveridge curve, which plots the unemployment rate against the job vacancy rate, is a common way to picture this. When many jobs are open and unemployment is also elevated, part of the explanation is matching friction: openings and job seekers exist, but they have not yet found each other.

How to Calculate Frictional Unemployment

No statistical agency publishes an official “frictional unemployment rate.” Economists approximate it from survey data that classify unemployed people by why they are unemployed. In the United States, the monthly Current Population Survey groups the unemployed into job losers, job leavers, reentrants and new entrants. The last three groups are the closest proxy for frictional unemployment:

Frictional unemployment rate ≈ (job leavers + reentrants + new entrants) ÷ civilian labor force × 100

The labor force is everyone employed plus everyone unemployed and actively looking; people not looking, such as retirees or discouraged workers, are excluded.

Hypothetical example: Suppose an economy has a labor force of 50 million. Among the unemployed are 300,000 people who quit their jobs, 250,000 who are returning after caring for family or finishing a degree, and 150,000 recent graduates looking for their first job. That is 700,000 people in the frictional groups, so the approximate frictional rate is 700,000 ÷ 50,000,000 = 1.4%.

The proxy is imperfect in both directions. Some job losers are frictionally unemployed (a laid-off accountant in a booming market may find a similar job within weeks), and some new entrants face structural barriers because their skills do not fit available openings.

Causes of Frictional Unemployment

New Entrants to the Labor Market

Recent graduates and other first-time job seekers often lack contacts, application experience and knowledge of who is hiring. Many also hold out for a job in their field or at a better wage rather than take the first offer.

Quitting for Better Pay or Career Fit

Workers who resign to seek higher pay, better conditions or more satisfying work add to frictional unemployment while they search, as do people who leave to retrain or study once they start looking for work again.

Returning After Time Away

People leave the labor force to raise children, care for family, recover from illness or retire for a time. While not searching, they are not counted as unemployed. Once they start looking again, they count as reentrants until hired.

Relocation

Moving to another city, for a partner’s job, lower living costs or family reasons, usually leaves a gap between jobs. That gap is frictional even if the worker’s skills are in demand in the new location.

Confidence and Savings

Workers are more likely to quit without another job lined up when they expect to be rehired quickly and have savings to cover several months without pay. For this reason the quit rate, published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics in its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS), is watched as a gauge of worker confidence.

Unemployment Benefits

Unemployment insurance replaces part of a worker’s income during a search, which can lengthen it because the worker can afford to turn down poor matches. Economists debate how large this effect is, and a longer search can also lead to a job that fits better and lasts longer.

Employer Hiring Behavior

Friction runs both ways. Employers may hold positions open for a candidate who meets every requirement or move slowly through screening, and each extra week adds to frictional unemployment.

Effects on the Economy and on People

For the economy, moderate frictional unemployment usually signals a functioning labor market. Workers change jobs more readily when businesses are expanding and openings are plentiful, and moving to better-matched jobs can raise productivity because labor ends up where it is most valued.

The cost is real, though: every person searching is not producing, so some output is lost compared with instant matching, a small gap between actual and potential GDP.

For employers, high voluntary turnover makes retention harder. Workers compare offers, and companies may need to raise pay, improve conditions or invest in training to keep strong performers. Replacing staff also brings recruiting and onboarding costs.

For individuals, a voluntary search can end in higher pay and a better fit, but it also means weeks or months without a paycheck, possible loss of employer health coverage and the risk that the search runs long. When many people change jobs at once, competition for attractive openings increases.

Limitations

Because there is no direct measure, estimates depend on how unemployed people are classified, and the line between frictional and structural unemployment is blurry: a long search can become structural if the worker’s skills do not match local demand. A rise in frictional unemployment can also reflect either confident quitting in a strong economy or more people re-entering the labor force.

Frictional Unemployment vs. Other Types

Cyclical Unemployment

Cyclical unemployment comes from weak demand during recessions, when businesses cut output and lay off workers. It rises and falls with the business cycle. Frictional unemployment often moves the opposite way: in a downturn fewer people dare to quit, so voluntary job changes decline even as total unemployment rises. Cyclical unemployment is the main target of economic stimulus.

Structural Unemployment

Structural unemployment arises from a lasting mismatch between workers’ skills or locations and available jobs, often caused by technological change, shifts in demand or industry decline. Coal miners displaced by a move to cleaner energy, or clerks whose tasks are automated, may stay unemployed until they retrain or relocate. Suitable jobs do not exist for them, whereas frictionally unemployed workers simply have not found one yet.

Seasonal Unemployment

Seasonal unemployment follows predictable swings in demand, such as ski instructors in summer, farm workers after harvest or retail staff after the holidays. Some economists treat it as frictional because it is temporary and expected; others list it separately because its cause is a demand pattern rather than search. Official statistics usually remove it through seasonal adjustment.

The Natural Rate of Unemployment

Frictional and structural unemployment together form the natural rate of unemployment. When cyclical unemployment is zero, the economy is considered to be at full employment, even though some people are still unemployed. Full employment therefore never means 0% unemployment.

How Policy Affects Frictional Unemployment

Lower interest rates from a central bank or higher government spending aim to boost demand, which reduces cyclical unemployment. They do little to shorten a job search when the problem is matching rather than a shortage of jobs. If anything, a stronger economy can raise frictional unemployment by encouraging more workers to quit and search.

Policies that target the matching process work better:

• Job-search information: public employment services and online job boards help workers and employers find each other faster.
• Career guidance and placement services for students, so graduates enter the labor market with clearer targets.
• Faster hiring practices, such as simpler applications and shorter screening periods.
• Benefit design, for example linking unemployment insurance to active job search.

Even with these measures, some frictional unemployment remains, because an economy where every worker accepted the first available job would produce worse matches.

The Bottom Line

Workers weighing a job change, employers managing turnover and anyone reading labor data should treat frictional unemployment as a normal sign of a working labor market. It never reaches zero, and it often rises when the economy is strong and workers feel confident enough to quit. Stimulus does little to shrink it, while better job information and faster hiring shorten searches.