What Are Economies of Scale? Definition, Types and Examples

Search Fintrev

Search our guides, reviews and glossary.

Economies of scale are the cost advantages a business gains when its average cost per unit falls as output rises. A firm that makes 100,000 units can often make each one more cheaply than a firm that makes 1,000, because some costs are spread over more units and some inputs get cheaper when bought or used in larger quantities. The effect has limits: past a certain size, coordination problems can push per-unit costs back up, which economists call diseconomies of scale.

How Economies of Scale Work

The concept rests on one ratio: average cost, or total cost divided by the number of units produced.

Average cost (AC) = Total cost (TC) ÷ Quantity (Q)

Total cost has two parts. Fixed costs do not change with output in the short run: rent, equipment, software licenses, salaried administrative staff, design work. Variable costs rise with each unit: raw materials, packaging, hourly labor, shipping.

So average cost can be split into average fixed cost and average variable cost:

AC = (Fixed costs ÷ Q) + (Variable costs ÷ Q)

As Q grows, the fixed-cost portion of each unit shrinks, because the same fixed sum is divided among more units. That alone produces economies of scale. If the variable cost per unit also falls (through volume discounts on materials or faster machinery), the decline is steeper.

Worked Example (Hypothetical)

Assume a bakery has $50,000 a year in fixed costs (lease, ovens, insurance) and a variable cost of $2.00 per loaf (flour, energy, packaging, hourly wages). Assume the fixed costs stay the same at every output level shown, meaning the existing ovens can handle up to 100,000 loaves a year.

The fixed cost carried by each loaf falls from $5.00 to $1.00 to $0.50. Now add a second assumption: above 50,000 loaves, the bakery’s flour supplier grants a bulk price that cuts variable cost to $1.80 per loaf. At 100,000 loaves, total cost becomes $50,000 + $180,000 = $230,000, and average cost drops to $2.30.

The example also shows where the savings stop. If the bakery wants to make 150,000 loaves, it needs a second oven and more floor space, so fixed costs jump. Average cost may rise temporarily until the new capacity is filled. Costs that increase in blocks like this are called step costs, and they are one reason real cost curves are lumpier than textbook diagrams.

Interpreting the Cost Curve

Economists show economies of scale with the long-run average cost (LRAC) curve, which plots the lowest achievable cost per unit at each output level when a firm can change all its inputs, including plant size. The curve is typically drawn as a U:

• Downward-sloping section: economies of scale. Each increase in output lowers average cost.
• Flat bottom: constant returns. Growing larger neither helps nor hurts unit costs.
• Upward-sloping section: diseconomies of scale. Further growth raises average cost.

The output level where the curve first reaches its lowest point is the minimum efficient scale (MES). A firm producing below MES faces a cost disadvantage against larger rivals; a firm beyond it gains nothing further from size. In industries where MES is very large relative to total market demand (power grids, aircraft manufacturing, semiconductor fabrication), only a few firms can operate at efficient scale, which tends to concentrate the market.

A numerical way to test for scale economies is cost elasticity: the percentage change in total cost divided by the percentage change in output. A value below 1 means costs grow more slowly than output, so average cost is falling. In the bakery example, output rising from 50,000 to 100,000 loaves (+100%) raised total cost from $150,000 to $250,000 (+67%), an elasticity of about 0.67.

Internal vs. External Economies of Scale

Internal Economies of Scale

Internal economies arise inside a single firm, from its size or its management’s choices. Competitors do not share them. The usual categories are:

• Technical: larger or more advanced machinery, automated lines, and production processes that raise output per worker. A single large tank or furnace often costs less per unit of capacity than several small ones.
• Purchasing: bulk orders earn discounts and better delivery terms from suppliers.
• Managerial: a larger firm can hire specialists (logistics planners, procurement managers, engineers) to improve each stage of production instead of relying on generalists.
• Financial: larger firms are generally seen as more creditworthy, which gives them wider access to capital and lower borrowing costs.
• Marketing: a national advertising campaign is spread over far more sales, and a large buyer of media can negotiate better rates. A dominant market position also strengthens bargaining with distributors.
• Risk-bearing: a firm with several product lines, markets, or investors can absorb a loss in one area without threatening the whole business.

Patents, proprietary technology, and established distribution networks can also give large firms cost advantages that smaller entrants cannot quickly copy.

External Economies of Scale

External economies come from outside the firm. They lower costs for many companies in an industry or location, and no single company controls them. Common sources include:

• A large pool of workers with industry-specific skills, which cuts hiring and training costs.
• Specialized suppliers and service providers that cluster around an industry.
• Shared infrastructure such as ports, rail links, and research universities.
• Government support such as subsidies or tax reductions aimed at an industry.
• Partnerships, joint ventures, and knowledge that spreads between firms in the same area.

Economies of Scale in Digital Businesses and Services

Digital products show economies of scale in an extreme form. Building software, a cloud platform, or a payment network requires heavy upfront development and infrastructure spending, but serving one more user often costs very little. Once those fixed costs are covered, adding users or entering new markets can raise revenue much faster than costs.

Service businesses gain scale mainly through overhead. A bank spreads its compliance systems, branch technology, and brand advertising across millions of accounts; an accounting or consulting firm standardizes processes and builds shared software tools; a hospital system buys equipment and supplies in bulk. The limit is that core service work depends on people’s time: a single advisor or surgeon can serve only so many clients, so scale gains come from the supporting overhead more than from the service itself.

Examples of Economies of Scale

• Job shops. A shop printing logo shirts spends a fixed amount designing the artwork and preparing the silk-screen pattern. An order of 500 shirts spreads that setup cost far more thinly than an order of 20, so the per-shirt price drops with order size.
• Assembly factories. Robotic lines and integrated technology reduce per-unit labor and error costs, but they only pay off at high volume.
• Large retailers. A national chain spreads warehouse, technology, advertising, and administrative costs across a huge number of sales and negotiates lower prices from suppliers.
• A restaurant kitchen (the limit). Adding cooks raises output at first, but in a fixed space, extra cooks eventually get in each other’s way. This is the standard illustration of the curve turning upward.

Why Economies of Scale Matter

Competitive advantage. Lower unit costs let a firm either earn higher margins at the same price or cut prices to win market share.

Barriers to entry. When efficient production requires large volume, new entrants must either invest heavily upfront or accept higher costs while they grow. This shapes industry structure, for example the threat-of-entry force in Porter’s Five Forces framework.

Pricing for consumers. Mass production has made many goods far cheaper than they were before industrialization. Whether savings reach consumers depends on competition: a firm with scale advantages and few rivals may keep the savings as profit instead.

Investment analysis. If revenue and output rise faster than costs over time, a company may be capturing economies of scale; if costs start rising faster than output, it may be running into diseconomies. Expanding operating margins alongside rising volume is one signal analysts look for.

Diseconomies of Scale

Common causes of rising average cost past a firm’s efficient size:

• Management and coordination problems. More layers of management slow decisions, and communication breaks down across departments and sites.
• Over-hiring and weak labor policies. Workers in very large organizations may feel less connected to results, and duplication of roles adds cost.
• Wider distribution. Serving more dispersed markets raises transport and logistics costs per unit.
• Poor expansion decisions. Opening too many locations, buying the wrong equipment, or hiring the wrong people can raise unit costs instead of lowering them.
• External factors. A deteriorating transportation network or congestion in an industry hub can raise costs for every firm in the area.

How Smaller Firms Narrow the Gap

Technology and management practices have been eroding traditional scale advantages for decades:

• Flexible equipment has lowered setup costs, and machinery is now available in sizes closer to smaller producers’ needs. Steel mini-mills and craft breweries compete with much larger incumbents partly for this reason.
• Outsourcing of accounting, human resources, marketing, treasury, legal, and IT lets small firms buy these functions at costs similar to what large firms pay internally.
• Micro-manufacturing, hyper-local production, and additive manufacturing (3D printing) reduce both setup and production costs for short runs.
• Global trade and logistics let small firms source inputs and reach customers at lower cost regardless of plant size.

Economies of Scale vs. Related Concepts

Returns to scale. Returns to scale describe output: what happens to production when all inputs increase by the same proportion. Economies of scale describe cost per unit. They often move together, but a firm can gain economies of scale without increasing returns to scale, for instance through bulk discounts on inputs.

Economies of scope. Economies of scope are savings from producing different products together, such as a company using one distribution network for several product lines. Economies of scale come from producing more of the same output.

Learning curve effects. Costs can fall as a firm gains cumulative experience, because workers and processes improve over time. That is driven by accumulated production, not the current scale of output, though the two are often linked.

Diminishing marginal returns. This is a short-run idea: adding more of one variable input (such as workers) to a fixed input (such as a kitchen) eventually yields smaller gains. Diseconomies of scale are a long-run idea about the whole firm growing too large. The restaurant kitchen example shows diminishing returns in a fixed space; a chain that opens too many restaurants and loses control of costs shows diseconomies of scale.

The Bottom Line

Business owners, analysts, and investors use economies of scale to judge whether growth is lowering unit costs or raising them. Expanding operating margins alongside rising volume suggests a firm is capturing scale benefits, while costs rising faster than output signal diseconomies. Size helps only up to minimum efficient scale, and flexible equipment and outsourcing now let smaller firms narrow much of the traditional gap.