Understanding Stock Ratings: Buy, Sell, and Hold Explained

Search Fintrev

Search our guides, reviews and glossary.

Stock ratings are short recommendations that equity analysts attach to a company’s shares to summarize their research. A buy means the analyst expects the stock to deliver a strong return. A hold means it should perform roughly in line with the market or its peers. A sell means the analyst expects it to lag and suggests reducing or exiting a position. Most firms add finer steps between those three, such as “outperform” or “underweight,” and each firm defines its own labels. A rating only makes sense once you know whose scale it comes from.

The five-tier rating scale

Firms use dozens of labels, but nearly all of them map back to five positions on a spectrum:

• Buy (strong buy): A recommendation to purchase the stock. Some firms call this being “on the recommended list” or a “conviction buy.”
• Outperform (moderate buy, accumulate, overweight): The stock is expected to do somewhat better than the market or its sector. “Accumulate” signals a positive view with less conviction than a full buy, suggesting building a position gradually.
• Hold (neutral, market perform, equal weight): The stock is expected to move in line with comparable companies or the broader market.
• Underperform (moderate sell, weak hold, underweight): The stock is expected to do somewhat worse than the market.
• Sell (strong sell): A recommendation to sell the shares or avoid them.

Some firms use only three tiers, and others use five. A three-tier firm’s “buy” may cover what a five-tier firm splits into “strong buy” and “outperform.” Because of this, two analysts can broadly agree on a company while showing different words.

Buy vs. outperform vs. overweight

Buy, outperform, market outperform and overweight are the most commonly confused labels. In practice they often occupy the same slot on different firms’ scales: the analyst thinks the stock will beat a reference point. The difference lies in what that reference point is:

• Absolute ratings (buy, sell) are judgments about the stock’s expected return on its own terms. These are often tied to a price target.
• Relative ratings (outperform, underperform, market perform) compare the stock with a benchmark. The benchmark might be a broad index such as the S&P 500, a sector index, or the other stocks the analyst covers.
• Weighting ratings (overweight, equal weight, underweight) speak the language of portfolio construction. They suggest holding more, the same or less of the stock than its weight in a benchmark or sector.

This distinction changes the meaning in a falling market. An “outperform” on a stock in a sector expected to drop 15% could still imply a loss, just a smaller one than its peers. An absolute “buy” implies the analyst expects the share price itself to rise. Each firm’s research reports include a disclosure section that defines every rating, its benchmark and its time horizon.

How analysts arrive at a rating

An analyst covering a company studies its filings, listens to earnings calls, talks with management and often gathers information from customers, suppliers and competitors. That work feeds a financial model projecting revenue, earnings and cash flow, which the analyst turns into a valuation. Our guide to fundamental analysis covers those methods.

Two outputs usually accompany the rating:

1. A price target: the share price the analyst expects the stock to reach over a stated period. Twelve months is a frequent horizon, but the firm’s disclosures define it.
2. A research report: the reasoning behind the call, including assumptions, risks and valuation method.

The report often matters more than the one-word label. Its discussion of market position, earnings forecasts and valuation assumptions can be more useful than the rating itself.

The rating and price target interact. If the stock rises close to the target, an analyst may downgrade to hold without changing any view on the business, simply because the expected upside has shrunk.

Upgrades, downgrades and initiations

Rating changes often move stock prices more than the ratings themselves, because they signal a change in an analyst’s view.

• Upgrade: a move up the scale, such as hold to buy. An upgrade from neutral to outperform means the analyst now expects the stock to beat its benchmark rather than track it.
• Downgrade: a move down the scale, such as buy to hold.
• Initiation: the first rating a firm publishes on a stock, often after a new analyst takes over coverage or the firm begins covering the company.
• Reiteration (maintained): the analyst keeps the rating, sometimes while changing the price target.

A reiterated buy combined with a lower price target is a softer signal than the unchanged label suggests. The analyst still likes the stock but expects less from it.

Consensus ratings: what “moderate buy” means

Financial data providers collect ratings from many analysts and summarize them as a consensus rating. Labels such as “strong buy,” “moderate buy,” “hold” or “moderate sell” usually come from this averaging, not from any single analyst.

Methods differ by provider. A common approach converts each rating to a number and averages the results.

Hypothetical example. Assume a provider scores ratings on a 1 to 5 scale (1 = strong buy, 2 = outperform, 3 = hold, 4 = underperform, 5 = sell). A stock covered by 10 analysts has 4 strong buys, 3 outperforms and 3 holds:

(4 × 1 + 3 × 2 + 3 × 3) ÷ 10 = 19 ÷ 10 = 1.9

Under this assumed scale, 1.9 sits between strong buy and outperform. A provider might display it as “moderate buy.” A different provider with different cutoffs or a different scale could label the same mix differently.

The average hides useful detail. A “hold” consensus could mean ten analysts all at hold, or five at buy and five at sell. Those are very different situations. The distribution of ratings and the number of analysts covering the stock tell you more than the single label. A consensus based on three analysts carries less weight than one based on thirty.

Why stock ratings so often say buy

When you look up a company, the ratings can appear tilted toward buy. Several structural reasons are commonly cited:

• Investment banking relationships: Most ratings come from analysts at banks that may also seek underwriting, advisory or other business from the companies they cover.
• Access to management: Analysts depend on company executives for calls and meetings. A harsh rating can make that relationship harder.
• Coverage selection: Firms choose which companies to cover, and they may be more inclined to cover stocks they view favorably.
• Softer language: Rather than issue a sell, an analyst may move to hold or underperform, which can act as a polite negative.

Regulators have addressed the conflict of interest. The 2003 Global Research Analyst Settlement between U.S. regulators and major investment banks required separation between research and investment banking. The SEC’s Regulation Analyst Certification (Reg AC) requires analysts to certify that a report reflects their personal views. FINRA Rule 2241 requires member firms to disclose the percentage of covered companies they rate buy, hold and sell, and how many companies in each category received investment banking services from the firm. A buy from a firm that rates most of its coverage buy says less than a buy from a firm that uses the rating sparingly.

Examples of analyst ratings and how stocks moved

Apple in 2020

In February 2020, as the COVID-19 outbreak shut Chinese factories, Apple shares fell about 25%. Goldman Sachs downgraded the stock to sell. Daiwa Capital moved its rating from buy to outperform. Canaccord Genuity kept its buy rating but cut its price target from $345 to $300. By August 2020, Apple had recovered and was trading at a new all-time high. An investor who sold on the downgrade would have missed that rebound.

Starbucks in 2024

In March 2024, one ratings aggregator showed a “strong buy” consensus for Starbucks, with 18 firms at buy, 27 at hold and no sell ratings. In April 2024, the shares fell from about $88 to $72, nearly 20%, after weak quarterly earnings and lower sales. The large share of holds within that consensus signaled less enthusiasm than the headline label suggested.

Coca-Cola in 2025

Ahead of Coca-Cola’s fourth-quarter earnings report in early 2025, Deutsche Bank, TD Cowen and Jefferies all raised their ratings from hold to buy. The stock went from $61.50 on January 6 to $71.35 on February 17, a gain of more than 15%, helped by an earnings surprise. In this case the upgrades preceded a strong move.

Three cases do not measure analyst accuracy in general, but they show that a rating is a forecast, and forecasts can miss shocks, earnings surprises and shifts in sentiment.

Buy-side vs. sell-side analysts

Published ratings come from sell-side analysts at investment banks and brokerages, whose research reaches clients and, through data providers, the wider market. Buy-side analysts at asset managers, hedge funds, pension funds and other institutions produce internal research for their own fund’s strategy and generally do not publish ratings. Their fund managers may read sell-side research as one input.

What to do with a sell rating on a stock you own

A single sell rating is one analyst’s view. Before acting on it, consider:

• The consensus: If most analysts have also turned negative, the view is broadly shared. If one firm stands alone, read its reasoning.
• The reason: A downgrade on valuation after a large rally differs from one based on falling sales or balance sheet stress.
• The scale: Check whether the firm’s “sell” is absolute or relative to a benchmark.
• Your own thesis: Judge whether the analyst’s concerns undermine your reason for owning the stock.

FAQs

The Bottom Line

Investors who check analyst ratings before buying or selling get more from the details than from the one-word label. Read the firm's disclosures to learn its scale, benchmark and time horizon, and look at the research report, the price target and the full spread of analyst views. Treat a single rating as one forecast to weigh against your own reasons for owning the stock.