The Importance of a Good Debt-to-Equity Ratio

By Markets & Investing DeskUpdated Nov 10, 2026

Key takeaways

  • A debt-to-equity reading of 133.33% equals a ratio of about 1.33, below the common 2.0 upper limit.
  • At a 1.33 ratio, creditors supply about 57% of financing and shareholders about 43%.
  • Debt raises return on equity when assets earn more than the interest rate and lowers it when they earn less.
  • Long-term debt to equity gives a lower figure than total liabilities to equity, so compare only matching formulas.

A debt-to-equity reading of 133.33% (often displayed as “$133.33,” meaning $133.33 of liabilities for every $100 of shareholder equity) works out to a ratio of about 1.33. For most companies, that is a moderate level of leverage, not an alarming one. It sits below the 2.0 level that analysts commonly treat as a general upper limit. Whether it is actually good depends on the company’s industry, its stage of growth, and how the figure compares with close competitors and with the company’s own history.

What a Good Debt-to-Equity Ratio Looks Like

The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a leverage measure: total liabilities divided by shareholder equity. It shows how much of a business is financed by creditors compared with owners.

D/E = Total liabilities ÷ Shareholder equity

There is no single ideal number, because what counts as acceptable varies widely by industry. The common rule of thumb is that a ratio at or below 2.0 is generally healthy. Some very large companies in fixed asset-heavy industries such as mining or manufacturing run above 2.0, but they are exceptions rather than the norm.

A ratio of 2.0 means the company has two dollars of liabilities for each dollar of equity. Put another way, about two-thirds of its financing comes from creditors and one-third from shareholders. Management usually tries to keep borrowing at a level the business can comfortably service, so the company can operate without real concern about defaulting on its loans or bonds.

Reading a 133.33% Ratio: An Example

Take a hypothetical company with $400,000 in total liabilities and $300,000 in shareholder equity:

  • D/E = $400,000 ÷ $300,000 = 1.3333, or 133.33%
  • Total financing = $400,000 + $300,000 = $700,000
  • Share from creditors = $400,000 ÷ $700,000 ≈ 57%
  • Share from owners = $300,000 ÷ $700,000 ≈ 43%

Creditors fund somewhat more of this business than shareholders do. That is common for companies that use borrowing to grow, and it leaves room below the 2.0 benchmark. The same logic applies to other percentage readings. A ratio of 117.58% is about 1.18 and slightly less leveraged. A ratio of 185% is 1.85, which is close to the usual ceiling. In that case the industry comparison carries more weight in deciding whether the level is normal or stretched.

Why Companies Carry Debt at All

A low ratio is not automatically better. A business that avoids debt entirely may be passing up growth. Borrowing lets a company turn a modest amount of capital into a much larger pool of funding and repay it over time. That means expansion projects can start sooner than they could if the company relied only on retained earnings or new share issues.

Debt also has cost advantages:

  • Tax treatment. Interest paid on business debt is generally tax-deductible in the United States, subject to limits. Dividends paid to shareholders are not. This “tax shield” lowers the after-tax cost of borrowing.
  • Cost of capital. Debt usually costs less than equity, because lenders have a prior claim on assets and cash flow and accept a lower return for that protection.

Leverage magnifies results in both directions. A hypothetical example, before taxes: a company has $1,000,000 in assets that earn 10%, or $100,000 a year.

Scenario Funding Interest (6% on debt) Profit to owners Return on equity
No debt, 10% asset return $1,000,000 equity $0 $100,000 10%
D/E of 1.0, 10% asset return $500,000 debt, $500,000 equity $30,000 $70,000 14%
No debt, 4% asset return $1,000,000 equity $0 $40,000 4%
D/E of 1.0, 4% asset return $500,000 debt, $500,000 equity $30,000 $10,000 2%

When assets earn more than the interest rate, debt lifts the return to shareholders. When they earn less, debt drags it down, and the interest bill stays fixed either way. This is why a higher D/E ratio is linked to higher risk. Owners may gain more in good years, but a weak year can quickly turn interest payments into a strain.

Higher or Lower: When the Answer Changes

As a general rule, a lower D/E ratio is preferred because it means less debt on the balance sheet. Several factors can change that conclusion.

Growth stage. A young, expanding company may need borrowed capital to scale, so a high ratio can reflect healthy investment. In a mature company, the same ratio is more likely to be a warning sign that the business may struggle to service its debts. That struggle can eventually lead to a credit event such as a default.

Industry. Capital-intensive sectors finance plants, equipment and infrastructure with long-term borrowing, so their typical ratios run higher. Compare a company with its sector before judging it. A D/E of 5 in an industry that averages 7 may not point to poor management or unusual risk.

Peers and trend. Look at the company’s closest competitors, the broader market, and the company’s own ratio over several years. A ratio that is climbing steadily tells a different story from one that has held stable.

Lender and investor perception. A company whose ratio is below its industry average tends to look lower-risk to lenders and investors. One that is well above average may find borrowing more expensive or investors less willing to buy in.

Which Version of the Ratio You Are Looking At

Published D/E figures are not always calculated the same way. Check the definition before comparing two numbers.

  • Total liabilities to equity includes everything the company owes: accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue and borrowings. It produces the highest figure.
  • Total debt to equity counts only interest-bearing borrowings, such as loans, bonds and sometimes lease obligations. It gives a lower number for the same company.
  • Long-term debt to equity includes only borrowings due after one year. It focuses on the permanent capital structure and gives the lowest figure of the three. Good values are correspondingly lower, so a long-term ratio should not be judged against a benchmark built for total liabilities.
  • Net debt to equity subtracts cash from debt before dividing. Here, too, lower generally means less leverage. A negative result means the company holds more cash than debt.

Comparing a 1.33 total-liabilities ratio with a 0.9 long-term-debt ratio from another company says nothing about which is more leveraged until both use the same formula.

Exceptions That Distort the Ratio

Negative equity. If accumulated losses or large share buybacks push shareholder equity below zero, the ratio turns negative or becomes meaningless. That does not mean the company has no debt. Read the balance sheet directly instead.

Very small equity. When equity is close to zero, small changes in it produce huge swings in the ratio. This explains why some well-known companies show extremely high readings.

Book value versus market value. The ratio uses accounting equity, which can differ sharply from what the business is worth. Pairing it with a business valuation gives a fuller picture.

Where D/E Fits Among Other Measures

The D/E ratio is a leverage ratio, also called a gearing ratio, and a type of solvency ratio. It estimates how well a company can handle its long-term debts and other obligations. Liquidity ratios do something different: they measure the ability to meet short-term bills. A company can have a reasonable D/E ratio and still run short of cash, or carry heavy debt but generate ample cash to service it.

The ratio matters because a company that cannot pay interest and principal on its loans or bonds risks a credit event, and a default can force it into bankruptcy. D/E is one way to spot that risk early. It works best alongside the cash flow statement, which shows whether operations actually produce the cash to cover interest. Profitability measures also help (see revenue vs. profit), along with other indicators of financial health.

The Bottom Line

Investors and lenders judging a company with a ratio near 1.33 can generally treat it as moderate leverage. The final call depends on the industry average, the company's growth stage, its closest peers and its own multiyear trend. Pair the ratio with the cash flow statement and profitability measures, and confirm which formula a published figure uses before comparing companies.

About this page

Written by Markets & Investing Desk

The Markets & Investing Desk covers investing guides, the financial dictionary, companies, people, economics and market data.

Published
Last updated

Spotted an error? Tell the editors. This page is general information, not financial advice.